30 Jun
2008
30 Jun
'08
7:38 p.m.
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 21:31 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 17:53 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
So, the answer is in an x86_64 install you need to add .x86_64 to your install commands.
You want to update that bug report mentioned above? Or should I do that? Should that be closed as "Not a bug"?
I've confirmed this on a box here - it's weird - the codepath should be identical - I'm doing a bit more spelunking.
Thank you.
okay - it's fixed in 3.2.X in git - probably working in 3.2.16, too - but not in 3.2.8.
-sv