On 22/07/10 23:15, R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Charlie Brady wrote:
timeliness *appears* not to be important to the CentOS project, hence this discussion.
Not intended to be a smear - please see timeline @
And this the week after OLS. Et tu? Ah well.
Sure it is a data point and I suppose 'we' of CentOS are supposed to promise to never disappoint whomever again.
Tough. Not me, thank you. This is a labor of love, and if you want commercial SLA's you'll have to buy them from me. Prices on request of a serious offer to purchase http://www.owlriver.com/wings/
I'm confused as to exactly what you are saying here. The CentOS Project FAQ states:
Q. How long after redhat publishes a fix does it take for CentOS to publish a fix?
A. Our goal is to have individual RPM packages available on the mirrors within 72 hours of their release, and normally they are available within 24 hours.
https://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=7
Are you implying that you will provide security updates under a paid SLA agreement but not to the wider CentOS Community?
<snip>
- shrug *
-- Russ herrold _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel