On Sep 16 12:22, Karsten Wade wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 09/16/2014 09:32 AM, Brian Stinson wrote:
On Sep 16 17:23, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Should we try and get a ToDo List together for the outstanding work ? That gives us a target to drive towards. Maybe even a trello board, so we can easily monitor who's doing what and who needs help where.
thanks
-- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
That sounds like a good idea, Is there already a Trello organization out there? I'm wondering if we should include the bugtracker as well.
I missed the meeting this week but read the log. It seemed one of our major blockers in the auth system. I was thinking it might be useful if we setup an instance of FreeIPA and Fedora Account System (FAS) to do a side-by-side comparison?
I'm available to work on the FAS instance this week, if there is anyone with FAS experience who can help or give advice, please do. :) I'm asking Fabian if he can setup a few of VMs for the auth tryout - something disposable where folks helping can get ssh + sudo to do the work. Just to be accurate, we may want to have a separate VM for the database as that's likely how we'd configure it in the end.
https://github.com/fedora-infra/fas/blob/develop/INSTALL http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/el/6/x86_64/ http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/el/7/x86_64/
Fedora is currently running FAS2 on EL6, primarily due to TurboGears requirements. I was told we can run the Postgres instance on CentOS 7, but trying to do the FAS2 on CentOS 7 sounds like a bit of a rathole right now. Anyway, lots of *.centos.org runs on CentOS 6, so no worries there. (FAS3 is coming end-of-year aiui, and it will run on CentOS 7.)
Anyone interested in setting up FreeIPA for a comparison?
We do know of one blocker for FreeIPA, which is that it doesn't have user self-service features - you can't reset your own password, etc. That may not be a problem for us if we have <200 users on the Koji+git, but if we use IPA for more than that, we'll have a scaling problem. One option is to code the module(s) ourselves, which is nothing I'm able to do. :)
- Karsten
Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYFAlQYjgwACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEFjLwCgnztaF5ae3eE+QfZ0gUNwEjDS YJ8AoImKkyZyvcpyG6sDIylGLQ5TREn8 =/u2H -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I suppose that's my cue to actually post links to the minutes from our Monday meeting! Sorry for the oversight everyone.
Summary: http://www.centos.org/minutes/2014/september/centos-devel.2014-09-15-13.01.h...
Chatlog: http://www.centos.org/minutes/2014/september/centos-devel.2014-09-15-13.01.l...
Brian
-- Brian Stinson bstinson@ksu.edu | IRC: bstinson | Bitbucket/Twitter: bstinsonmhk