18 Jun
2014
18 Jun
'14
12:59 p.m.
On 06/17/2014 05:58 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 06/17/2014 06:24 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
From: Pat Riehecky riehecky@fnal.gov
I realized the scripts I've been sending in weren't licensed.
So, I've added one to show_possible_srpms.sh.
Perhaps we should talk about getting the rest of the tools under an open source license.
Pat Riehecky (1): Realized this was missing a license, added
any specific reason to go with GPLv3 ?
Not really, just seemed like a workable choice for a pile of scripts.
Pat
--
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/