A few quick thoughts....
1. Does the SIG need a naming convention also, e.g.
CentOS-7.1407-Cloud-140805
i.e. the cloud SIG based build done on 5th August 2014 based off the CentOS 7 tree in July 2014.
2. The minor release number is not in the naming convention. Is this a question of length ?
CentOS-7.0-1407
I am thinking as we get to beta releases of 7.1, having a mechanism to name the beta releases independently of the production ones would be useful.
Tim
-----Original Message----- From: centos-devel-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-devel- bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh Sent: 07 June 2014 02:44 To: centos-devel@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 7 and release numbering
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
hi,
Taking on board the community and environment expansion that is taking place around the CentOS project, the CentOS Board has been considering how best to accomodate these efforts.
I'm attaching here a plan put forward by the board towards that aim.
Thoughts ? Comments ?
- KB
Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlOSYF4ACgkQMA29nj4Tz1usTwCgr9K0th6XcMzSmjGQvwnbeeiR KhsAn36gaRbCuGoGzqEa2TN+TDFEEZjR =GbVM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----