Re: [CentOS-devel] Proposal: CentOS x86 SIG

-- Brian Stinson brian@bstinson.com On Thu, Mar 2, 2023, at 07:27, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 02/03/2023 06:20, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Fabian Arrotin: >> >>> On 27/02/2023 18:23, Florian Weimer wrote: >>>> # Goals >>>> >>> <snip> >>>> Resources >>>> They SIG could benefit from spare x86-64 Koji builder capacity. >>>> >>> >>> Can you elaborate on that ? You mean just using existing x86_64 >>> builders (matching x86-64-v2 specs but nothing like v3), right ? >>> Just trying to capture things before it's even just accepted as a SIG >>> .. and not after, realizing that we wouldn't have what you're >>> searching for :) >> >> I think the CentOS builders are already compatible with x86-64-v4, so no >> configuration changes are needed. I verified that for >> x86-02.stream.rdu2.redhat.com: it reports all the necessary CPU >> features. >> > > Well, yes, but that's not the infra that SIGs are using either : Stream > is itself built elsewhere (different koji/infra), reason why I was > asking if you need something on the infra *where* SIGs are building > packages (older than the Stream infra) > > -- > Fabian Arrotin > The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org > gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | @arrfab[@fosstodon.org] > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > Attachments: > * OpenPGP_signature