On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 08:45 +0200, Tru Huynh wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 11:10:16AM +1000, John Newbigin wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
I was thinking a GFS directory (one under 3 and one under 4) and the $arch, SRPMS, $arch/GFS, $arch/CS under that ... so we can run createrepo and yum-arch in $arch directory and have one repo (GFS) to add to users yum configs instead of two. How does that sound? (Since for CentOS-4 they work together)
I think they should be combined, but RedHat have decided that they are separate. It is worth adding extra confusion by not doing it 'The Red Hat Way'?
If so, perhaps a "csgfs" directory, like the RH docs http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/csgfs/
I second this idea, the RHGFS need the RHCS ones.
The main issue I see is the QA test: how do we compare the CentOS binary rpms against the genuine ones?
I can re-sign your rpms, no pb.
cheers,
Tru
OK, Combined makes since to me too .. looks like agreement on "csgfs" as semi RedHat like.
I can go ahead and do a csgfs directory and put all the docs in there (for 3 and 4) if everyone agrees
Lance ... what do you think?