Ironically, I work in an environment, where a usb stick is forbidden, but that said, I usually try to use the liveDVD's. I only have one system that has only a cd drive (no dvd), but the older releases support it just fine. So that's cool.
-----Original Message----- From: centos-devel-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-devel-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nux! Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 1:26 PM To: The CentOS developers mailing list. Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 7 liveCD survey
Fabian,
I think the browser is the one component you must not remove from the Live "CD". I agree with Manuel, just take as much space as is needed to do a reasonable job and make sure dd-ing to USB stick works. Don't publish handicaped ISOs. :)
Most people's machines nowadays hardly even have a DVD reader, let alone a CD one; e.g the last laptop I bought (2 years ago) came without such optical unit.
Lucian
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fabian Arrotin" arrfab@centos.org To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." centos-devel@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, 25 November, 2015 14:42:43 Subject: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 7 liveCD survey
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi,
While working on the next 7.1511 Live media, I discovered that the size for the actual CentOS 7 LiveCD would be more than 700MB.
It's due to some packages being now bigger and bigger, also due to the big Gnome 3.8 -> 3.14 rebase. One obvious package I can remove from the packages manifest (which itself is consuming more and more space) is Firefox.
If I remove it from the packages manifest (only for LiveCD, it will obviously stay for the LiveGnome and LiveKDE DVD iso images), it's then back to 650 MB, so that would mean that one would still be able to burn it on a CD.
But the real question is then : does that even make sense ? for each release, we're now fighting with disk space constraints, and I'm each time removing packages from that LiveCD image. If we remove Firefox itself, that would mean that such LiveCD would be useful just for people willing to "test" CentOS on their hardware, but that would be a basic Gnome desktop.
It builds/runs fine, can be installed too (like before), but I'd like your opinion about this.
Cheers,
Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlZVyOMACgkQnVkHo1a+xU4w4ACdEZZJbJwEXaq1BrsorEW9YZSR EcYAn3BwnoHgwRV97f0yAKaGspvaux+u =OXeJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
_______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel