On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wolfy@nobugconsulting.ro wrote:
On 01/10/2015 01:36 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 01/09/2015 10:50 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
On 01/05/2015 05:30 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
CentOS and for solutions to support requests, why is it maintained outside the CentOS.org domain?
I guess you could extend that to github.com and then most of the stuff going on there would be wrong according to you as well right ?
-- Karanbir Singh
Sorry for the slow response when you're answering my question.
According to the FAQ < http://community.redhat.com/centos-faq/#_git_centos_org >, "git.centos.org ... is the canonical repository for the CentOS Project, and for SIGs working on variants." So, yes, I would expect anything that is regularly used in building CentOS or proposed as support items for CentOS' use by the community to be readily available on git.centos.org.
nothing on nazar should be consider centos 'project' assets. its my personal stuff, just like everything else karan.org would be. I am struggling to see why you might be confused by that.
I assume the confusion is triggered by us ( me ) recommending something from your personal web site rather than from one "fully blessed " by CentOS ( whatever that would mean )
That would be the short version of what I just posted.