Sorry for not mentioning that on the list also, but there is no bug, the whole thing was related to a corrupted file on my system, cf. http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5550
On Feb 27, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
On 02/27/2012 01:37 AM, Thomas Göttgens wrote:
Guten Tag Manuel,
you threw in a 686 kernel at the 3rd prompt :-) - Still the numbers differ from the OP...
On purpose. Results taken from a different machine with different arch. The original poster used results for 32 bits and I wanted to rule out smtg specific to a particular arch.
[root@pegasus ~]# awk '{print $4;}' /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c 6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL 3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
[wolfy@wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}' /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c 6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL 3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL [wolfy@wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}' /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c 6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL 3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL [root@DB ~]# awk '{print $4;}' /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.i686/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c 6124 EXPORT_SYMBOL 3706 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-- Manuel Wolfshant linux registered user #131416 IT manager NoBug Consulting SRL A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel