22 Sep
2009
22 Sep
'09
6:51 p.m.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Jerry Amundson jamundso@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/22/09, Ross Walker rswwalker@gmail.com wrote:
Well maybe a dkms port to 'extras' wouldn't be asking too much?
It's in EPEL, if we can leverage off that...
It really is important to have the dkms kmod and dkms located in the same repo for dependancy reasons.
Another problem with dkms kmods is the development requirements, which can be troublesome in some deployments. That reminds me to update the dkms module install dependencies to include the development environment.
It might be possible to have a dkms kmod though alongside a kabi tracking kmod, dkms will supercede the kabi module, and put it back when/if the dkms module is removed.
-Ross