-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Manuel Tuthill wrote: |> I doubt that hijacking a thread will endear you to the developers!
| Reading the note on thread hijacking I do not think I'm guilty but while I'm | happy to have a drawn out discussion on netiquette I'm fairly sure that here | isn't the right place. If anyone would like to continue the discussion I'd | be happy to respond off list, or you can grab me on IRC #centos(Lawbringer). | | Is it possible to now return to discussing the possibility of i586 support | under C5?
Guilty as charged based on the evidence found in the headers of your own message:
From: "Manuel Tuthill" Manuel@Nebula-IT.co.uk To: "'The CentOS developers mailing list.'" centos-devel@centos.org References: 47F51DEC.9070204@ociweb.com 47F53D35.7050502@centos.org 47F53DDF.4080104@ociweb.com 47F54952.7030506@karan.org 47F548E8.8040407@ociweb.com47F54D97.5090901@karan.org 47F54DFD.6000605@ociweb.com Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:26:21 +0100 Message-ID: 009b01c89646$be2a4ee0$0201a8c0@luke
So we should return to the subject of "CentOS and JBoss" as by your request.
If you want to start a new thread then do so. But do it with a fresh message and not a reply. This branch is pretty much dead.
Hugo.
- -- hvdkooij@vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.