On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 16:14 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
During the board meeting, the naming issue was re-raised; “x86 SIG” just isn't that great. So I'd like to propose “x86-64 SIG” instead, with a hyphen. We use “x86_64” in the RPM architecture name and configure triplets, but only because we must, as “-” is consindered a separator in these contexts. The official vendor-neutral architecture name is x86-64.
During the meeting, I was under the impression that the board was leaning towards a narrow scope, but that is not quite what the posted minutes reflect. Per Fabian's announcement, we have at least a bit of wiggle room for non-x86 ISA experiments in CBS (ThunderX2 has LSE atomics support). Personally, I'm not interested in such experiments at this time, though. But we could call the SIG “ISA SIG” to keep open the possibility for non-x86 work, if that's what people want.
Thoughts?
Thanks, Florian
Perhaps setting up "working groups" within the SIG would help clarify the current scope of work?
An ISA SIG with an x86-64 working group would clarify that no work is currently focused on any other arches, but leave open a door if other folks wanted to form some sort of s390x working group - but they'd be on their own?
Pat