I'd prefer the third option. This would allow us to have the update as soon as possible and to be as close as possible to the original vendor.
Am Mittwoch, den 31.10.2007, 22:34 +0000 schrieb Karanbir Singh:
humm..
<issue> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1020.html release tags indicate it was built against 5.1, something we have not seen as yet.... </issue>
Options:
We build it with what we have at the moment, 5.0 + Updates
We wait for 5.1 before building it ( Note: it _is_ a security
issue... so keep this in mind )
- We build it now against 5.0 and Tag it accordingly, and then rebuild
it when 5.1 is out and then change Tag to 5_1. It will be a different RPM and would involve most uses doing two updates.
Opinions ?