-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 06/29/2015 11:54 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:09:12AM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
First, the flag being *_cla continues to create an impression that there is a CLA in Fedora; note that in fact the Subject: of this thread is really a misnomer. I think it makes for a prejudiced reading.
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4806
Second, the only problem I've ever had with the FPCA is that it is written as a legal document, so causes people's eyes to glaze over. I've got an alternative to consider, which is a bit easier to read and accomplishes the same thing. I wrote it with Richard Fontana, who was lead author and legal counsel on the FPCA.
If Richard is interested in going through this again with Fedora, I won't say no. :)
Sounds like something the Board should look at.
With the precedence of inbound == outbound we may have all we need right there.
It doesn't need to be a complicated policy (read the above, IMO it accomplishes what the FPCA does in fewer words.)
Honestly, I think that once one gets through the gigantic "Terms" section Fedora has, and over the monospace formatting, it's really no more or less complicated. But whatever. :)
Actually you are right, the core of it is all similar (theopensourceway.org one came later iirc), without the "Terms" section that I think strikes the fear in hearts of many. And glaze ...
- - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41