Hi guys,
I noticed that golang-github-gorilla-mux 0-0.15.git136d54f.el7_0 is in the ‘updates' and in the ‘extras' repo. Older versions where only in ‘extras’. Is that a conscious change of policy, or did something go wrong with the routing of that version?
Cheers,
Matthias - just curious
On 01/29/2015 04:04 AM, Matthias Schroeder wrote:
Hi guys,
I noticed that golang-github-gorilla-mux 0-0.15.git136d54f.el7_0 is in the ‘updates' and in the ‘extras' repo. Older versions where only in ‘extras’. Is that a conscious change of policy, or did something go wrong with the routing of that version?
This change was done to mirror the upstream repo structure. We're unsure why it was done upstream, but for us it was an intentional change to stay consistent.
Hi Jim,
On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:37, Jim Perrin jperrin@centos.org wrote:
On 01/29/2015 04:04 AM, Matthias Schroeder wrote:
Hi guys,
I noticed that golang-github-gorilla-mux 0-0.15.git136d54f.el7_0 is in the ‘updates' and in the ‘extras' repo. Older versions where only in ‘extras’. Is that a conscious change of policy, or did something go wrong with the routing of that version?
This change was done to mirror the upstream repo structure. We're unsure why it was done upstream, but for us it was an intentional change to stay consistent.
OK, thanks for the info. Since I should have check upstream repos as well…
Cheers,
Matthias
-- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
On 01/29/2015 09:49 AM, Matthias Schroeder wrote:
Hi Jim,
On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:37, Jim Perrin jperrin@centos.org wrote:
On 01/29/2015 04:04 AM, Matthias Schroeder wrote:
Hi guys,
I noticed that golang-github-gorilla-mux 0-0.15.git136d54f.el7_0 is in the ‘updates' and in the ‘extras' repo. Older versions where only in ‘extras’. Is that a conscious change of policy, or did something go wrong with the routing of that version?
This change was done to mirror the upstream repo structure. We're unsure why it was done upstream, but for us it was an intentional change to stay consistent.
OK, thanks for the info. Since I should have check upstream repos as well…
To be more clear .. initially in RHEL 7.0, golang-github-gorilla-mux was only in RHEL extras as a build requirement for docker, also in only in RHEL extras.
The latest release of golang-github-gorilla-mux was released instead into "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7)".
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0081.html
I have no idea why it was released into there, but we did it based on their release.
When this happens, we will roll these type of packages into updates .. but we will also keep them in extras.
-
Jim Perrin -
Johnny Hughes -
Matthias Schroeder