On the last meeting [1] we talked about whether we need maven and rh-java-common for rebuilding devtoolset-3. Unfortunately it is a requirement right now, so we need to have maven and rh-java-common collections first.
However, the maven and rh-java-common SCL dependencies are needed just for the devtoolset-3-ide part, so for devtoolset-3-toolchain and devtoolset-3-perftools we may remove the requirements temporarily.
Anyway, there have been requests for devtoolset and gcc-5 especially, often from other projects based on CentOS, so copr builds are not enough.
We're still not ready with the centpkg/lookaside-cache things, but what about to create necessary tags from devtoolset-3 collection and build packages from srpms for now?
Thomas, is it ^ possible? What information do you need from me?
Let's limit on sclo part and RHEL-7 only. Based on the tags we consulted before, that should mean to create:
* sig-sclo7-devtoolset-3-sclo tag * sclo7-devtoolset-3-sclo-el7 target and associated buildroot
Correct?
Will it be possible to tag built packages (I speak still about scratch builds) to sig-sclo7-sclo, which other SIGs could depend on?
[1] http://www.centos.org/minutes/2015/may/centos-devel.2015-05-20-14.31.html [2] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhscl/devtoolset-3-el7/builds/
Honza
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 08/06/15 17:22, Honza Horak wrote:
On the last meeting [1] we talked about whether we need maven and rh-java-common for rebuilding devtoolset-3. Unfortunately it is a requirement right now, so we need to have maven and rh-java-common collections first.
However, the maven and rh-java-common SCL dependencies are needed just for the devtoolset-3-ide part, so for devtoolset-3-toolchain and devtoolset-3-perftools we may remove the requirements temporarily.
Anyway, there have been requests for devtoolset and gcc-5 especially, often from other projects based on CentOS, so copr builds are not enough.
We're still not ready with the centpkg/lookaside-cache things, but what about to create necessary tags from devtoolset-3 collection and build packages from srpms for now?
that should work, the other SIGs are also using this route for the time being. Atleast this would allow us to proof the git/lookaside process once that comes up.
- -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
Hi,
On 08/06/15 18:22, Honza Horak wrote:> On the last meeting [1] we
Thomas, is it ^ possible? What information do you need from me?
Let's limit on sclo part and RHEL-7 only. Based on the tags we consulted before, that should mean to create:
- sig-sclo7-devtoolset-3-sclo tag
- sclo7-devtoolset-3-sclo-el7 target and associated buildroot
Ok we can do that. I'll try to get the tag created later today and update the ticket. If you can provide few src.rpm without listed dependencies above so I can test (devtoolset-3 I guess and one more.)
Correct?
Will it be possible to tag built packages (I speak still about scratch builds) to sig-sclo7-sclo, which other SIGs could depend on?
yes.
[1] http://www.centos.org/minutes/2015/may/centos-devel.2015-05-20-14.31.html [2] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhscl/devtoolset-3-el7/builds/
Honza
On 06/08/2015 06:47 PM, Thomas Oulevey wrote:
Hi,
On 08/06/15 18:22, Honza Horak wrote:> On the last meeting [1] we
Thomas, is it ^ possible? What information do you need from me?
Let's limit on sclo part and RHEL-7 only. Based on the tags we consulted before, that should mean to create:
- sig-sclo7-devtoolset-3-sclo tag
- sclo7-devtoolset-3-sclo-el7 target and associated buildroot
Ok we can do that. I'll try to get the tag created later today and update the ticket.
I've created a ticket: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=8868
If you can provide few src.rpm without listed dependencies above so I can test (devtoolset-3 I guess and one more.)
And two initial packages are available here: https://hhorak.fedorapeople.org/devtoolset-3/
I just built those two packages in mock, so it should work.
Honza
Correct?
Will it be possible to tag built packages (I speak still about scratch builds) to sig-sclo7-sclo, which other SIGs could depend on?
yes.
[1]
http://www.centos.org/minutes/2015/may/centos-devel.2015-05-20-14.31.html
[2] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhscl/devtoolset-3-el7/builds/
Honza
is there any reason to rebuild devtoolset-3 for centos rather then use softwarecollections's repos like: https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-3/ https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/rh-java-common/ i don't see any reason for this (since softwarecollections already a rebuild of rhscl by rh people).
On 06/08/2015 06:22 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On the last meeting [1] we talked about whether we need maven and rh-java-common for rebuilding devtoolset-3. Unfortunately it is a requirement right now, so we need to have maven and rh-java-common collections first.
However, the maven and rh-java-common SCL dependencies are needed just for the devtoolset-3-ide part, so for devtoolset-3-toolchain and devtoolset-3-perftools we may remove the requirements temporarily.
Anyway, there have been requests for devtoolset and gcc-5 especially, often from other projects based on CentOS, so copr builds are not enough.
We're still not ready with the centpkg/lookaside-cache things, but what about to create necessary tags from devtoolset-3 collection and build packages from srpms for now?
Thomas, is it ^ possible? What information do you need from me?
Let's limit on sclo part and RHEL-7 only. Based on the tags we consulted before, that should mean to create:
- sig-sclo7-devtoolset-3-sclo tag
- sclo7-devtoolset-3-sclo-el7 target and associated buildroot
Correct?
Will it be possible to tag built packages (I speak still about scratch builds) to sig-sclo7-sclo, which other SIGs could depend on?
[1] http://www.centos.org/minutes/2015/may/centos-devel.2015-05-20-14.31.html [2] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhscl/devtoolset-3-el7/builds/
Honza _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
On 09/06/15 09:42, Farkas Levente wrote:
is there any reason to rebuild devtoolset-3 for centos rather then use softwarecollections's repos like: https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-3/ https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/rh-java-common/ i don't see any reason for this (since softwarecollections already a rebuild of rhscl by rh people).
the plan is to have the softwarecollections builds go away and be replaced by the CentOS ones. The work being done in the SCL SIG at CentOS is -by- and -for- the softwarecollections.org effort.
regards,
- KB
-
Farkas Levente -
Honza Horak -
Karanbir Singh -
Karanbir Singh -
Thomas Oulevey