I found and was briefly worried by
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/log4j/-/tree/c9s
this morning, and then realized that
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/log4j/-/tree/main
has "dead.package log4j package is retired for CS-626".
Could the package-retirement process be updated to also retire packages in c9s branches?
Thanks!
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021, 2:40 PM Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org wrote:
I found and was briefly worried by
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/log4j/-/tree/c9s
this morning, and then realized that
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/log4j/-/tree/main
has "dead.package log4j package is retired for CS-626".
Could the package-retirement process be updated to also retire packages in c9s branches?
We might do that eventually, but right now we're still in flux and sometimes reverse course on inclusion of a package in RHEL. We want to avoid adding commits to the c9s branches that make synchronization more difficult when that occurs.
josh
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:51:57AM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
Could the package-retirement process be updated to also retire packages in c9s branches?
We might do that eventually, but right now we're still in flux and sometimes reverse course on inclusion of a package in RHEL. We want to avoid adding commits to the c9s branches that make synchronization more difficult when that occurs.
Well, you probably don't want to syncronize _that_ one without some additional commits anyway....