We talked earlier on IRC about the Asus Eeepc I think the idea was to start a wiki page with at least informations regarding the Eeepc. So here it is : http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Asus/Eeepc (not linked from the CentOS on Laptops wiki page yet though , still a draft ;-) )
I had to modify the installer initrd.img to include the atl2.ko module for the wired nic to install from my local mirror .. where do i store it ? on the wiki page itself, as an attachment ? a simple link to a tmp space on my website ?
I'm now wondering what's the best way to include the atl2.ko module during setup : a rpm that will be fetched from centos extras (?) or a simple driverdisk ?
Ideas & comments welcome ...
Dear Adrian.
We talked earlier on IRC about the Asus Eeepc I think the idea was to start a wiki page with at least informations regarding the Eeepc. So here it is : http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Asus/Eeepc (not linked from the CentOS on Laptops wiki page yet though , still a draft ;-) )
First, thanks for your work on Eee support.
I had to modify the installer initrd.img to include the atl2.ko module for the wired nic to install from my local mirror .. where do i store it ? on the wiki page itself, as an attachment ? a simple link to a tmp space on my website ?
I'm now wondering what's the best way to include the atl2.ko module during setup : a rpm that will be fetched from centos extras (?) or a simple driverdisk ?
I would suggest to use ddiskit as that's what it's meant to be for.
An option could be to build an RPM and to include it in an additional repository.
Best Regards Marcus
Marcus Moeller wrote:
Dear Adrian.
Dear Roger ,
I would suggest to use ddiskit as that's what it's meant to be for.
Yeah, that was one of the possibility i had a look at ...
An option could be to build an RPM and to include it in an additional repository.
That was the alternative to a dd ... i was thinking about a very small epo specific for the eeepc that could host the patched madwifi , the uvcvideo kmod (for the webcam) and the atl2.ko module ...
But if Karanbir wants to take an alternative path to the traditionnal anaconda stuff ...
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
Marcus Moeller wrote:
Dear Adrian.
Dear Roger ,
Dear Eleanor,
That was the alternative to a dd ... i was thinking about a very small epo specific for the eeepc that could host the patched madwifi , the uvcvideo kmod (for the webcam) and the atl2.ko module ...
But can you reach that repo with your eee pc (does it have a normal ethernet interface?).
But if Karanbir wants to take an alternative path to the traditionnal anaconda stuff ...
Hm?
Ralph
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
Marcus Moeller wrote:
Dear Adrian.
Dear Roger ,
Dear Eleanor,
Dear Erik, ... :-p
That was the alternative to a dd ... i was thinking about a very small epo specific for the eeepc that could host the patched madwifi , the uvcvideo kmod (for the webcam) and the atl2.ko module ...
But can you reach that repo with your eee pc (does it have a normal ethernet interface?).
The atl2 nic is a wired one ... the wireless nic (on the 900) needs a specific madwifi version So yes, assuming that the user wants to setup from the network/can access the specific repo, that can be doable ..
But if Karanbir wants to take an alternative path to the traditionnal anaconda stuff ...
Hm?
Ralph
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
I had to modify the installer initrd.img to include the atl2.ko module for the wired nic to install from my local mirror .. where do i store it ? on the wiki page itself, as an attachment ? a simple link to a tmp space on my website ?
I'm now wondering what's the best way to include the atl2.ko module during setup : a rpm that will be fetched from centos extras (?) or a simple driverdisk ?
Ideas & comments welcome ...
I've been working on an alternate installer, which does not use anaconda at all, for the eeepc since we need to change a lot of default stuff in order to get the basic stuff working in a reasonable manner.
Also, is this atl2 ko based on the one that I had built sometime back or is this from the 2.x version ? if so, is it stable enough to rebase onto in the 2.6.18 code ?
PS: please dont crosspost.
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
I had to modify the installer initrd.img to include the atl2.ko module for the wired nic to install from my local mirror .. where do i store it ? on the wiki page itself, as an attachment ? a simple link to a tmp space on my website ?
I'm now wondering what's the best way to include the atl2.ko module during setup : a rpm that will be fetched from centos extras (?) or a simple driverdisk ?
Ideas & comments welcome ...
I've been working on an alternate installer, which does not use anaconda at all, for the eeepc since we need to change a lot of default stuff in order to get the basic stuff working in a reasonable manner.
Hmm, is that not too much work, especially when 5.3 and further releases show their heads ?
Also, is this atl2 ko based on the one that I had built sometime back or is this from the 2.x version ? if so, is it stable enough to rebase onto in the 2.6.18 code ?
It's still the v1 of the driver, so basically the same that you used .. except that i rebuilt it from http://repo.redhat-club.org/redhat/5/SRPMS/atl2-kmod-1.0.40.4-el5.rhc.1.src.... ... We tried with Manuel Wolfshant to have the v2 driver built on 2.6.18 but it didn't work (Manuel took contact with the devel guy but i think he had still no answer )
PS: please dont crosspost.
Yeah, sorry for that (but of course i didn't intend to continue the discussion on the -docs list).. i think i should have divided my post in two : one for -docs regarding the created wiki page and the other one about the core discussion ..
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Fabian Arrotin wrote: Also, is this atl2 ko based on the one that I had built sometime back or is this from the 2.x version ? if so, is it stable enough to rebase onto in the 2.6.18 code ?
It's still the v1 of the driver, so basically the same that you used .. except that i rebuilt it from http://repo.redhat-club.org/redhat/5/SRPMS/atl2-kmod-1.0.40.4-el5.rhc.1.src.... ... We tried with Manuel Wolfshant to have the v2 driver built on 2.6.18 but it didn't work (Manuel took contact with the devel guy but i think he had still no answer )
As discussed yesterday on #centos-devel, I've created a patch [1] for madwifi (based on a version from fedora 8 [2]).
A src.rpm is available on my site [3]. Feel free to use the patch and/or src.rpm to provide support for an eeePC :)
Cheers, Niels
[1] http://www.nixpanic.net/software/patches/madwifi-ng-r2756_rhel52.patch?attre... [2] http://tchung.fedorapeople.org/madwifi/ar2425/2.6.24.3-34.fc8/ [3] http://www.nixpanic.net/software/packages/madwifi-0.2756.20071018-6.src.rpm?...
Niels de Vos wrote:
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Fabian Arrotin wrote: Also, is this atl2 ko based on the one that I had built sometime back or is this from the 2.x version ? if so, is it stable enough to rebase onto in the 2.6.18 code ?
It's still the v1 of the driver, so basically the same that you used .. except that i rebuilt it from http://repo.redhat-club.org/redhat/5/SRPMS/atl2-kmod-1.0.40.4-el5.rhc.1.src.... ... We tried with Manuel Wolfshant to have the v2 driver built on 2.6.18 but it didn't work (Manuel took contact with the devel guy but i think he had still no answer )
As discussed yesterday on #centos-devel, I've created a patch [1] for madwifi (based on a version from fedora 8 [2]).
A src.rpm is available on my site [3]. Feel free to use the patch and/or src.rpm to provide support for an eeePC :)
Cheers, Niels
[1] http://www.nixpanic.net/software/patches/madwifi-ng-r2756_rhel52.patch?attre... [2] http://tchung.fedorapeople.org/madwifi/ar2425/2.6.24.3-34.fc8/ [3] http://www.nixpanic.net/software/packages/madwifi-0.2756.20071018-6.src.rpm?...
Thanks Niels
I've rebuilt your madwifi patched SRPM and it works ok on the Eee PC .. i still don't know what will be the official CentOS way regarding that .. but because madwifi contains 'non-free' stuff, it should be better if that rpm would be available from a third-party repo, and not from centos extras for example ... What others think about that ? I'll wait for an official answer before updating the wiki page and point to the madwifi rpms (madwifi and madwifi module)