hi, it seems there are a few source packages missing from 5.4: celt051-0.5.1.3-0.el5.src.rpm etherboot-5.4.4-10.el5.src.rpm iasl-20061109-5.el5.src.rpm kvm-83-105.el5.src.rpm log4cpp-1.0-4.el5.src.rpm qcairo-1.8.7.1-3.el5.src.rpm qffmpeg-0.4.9-0.15.20080908.el5.src.rpm qpixman-0.13.3-4.el5.src.rpm qspice-0.3.0-39.el5.src.rpm it seems all x86_64 only package's source are missing:-)
at the same time nautilus-sendto-1.0.1-6.el5.centos.src.rpm pango-1.14.9-6.el5.centos yum-metadata-parser-1.1.2-3.el5.centos.src.rpm has no reason to be .centos since there is no changes from rhel and i also suspect etherboot-5.4.4-10.el5.centos.X.rpm but as there is no src.rpm for etherboot i can't check it.
On 11/08/2009 10:54 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
it seems there are a few source packages missing from 5.4:
Will look into these, might need to push them out manually.
On 11/10/2009 11:16 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 11/08/2009 10:54 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
it seems there are a few source packages missing from 5.4:
Will look into these, might need to push them out manually.
and what about the not really .centos packages?
On 11/10/2009 10:20 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 11/10/2009 11:16 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 11/08/2009 10:54 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
it seems there are a few source packages missing from 5.4:
Will look into these, might need to push them out manually.
and what about the not really .centos packages?
What is the issue ?
Keep in mind that once a package is marked as .centos - it will stay as such during the life of the distro unless there are some very good reasons ( like it causes issues retaining that tag ).
On 11/10/2009 11:25 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 11/10/2009 10:20 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 11/10/2009 11:16 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 11/08/2009 10:54 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
it seems there are a few source packages missing from 5.4:
Will look into these, might need to push them out manually.
and what about the not really .centos packages?
What is the issue ?
that they seems to be modified even though there is no modifications:-(
Keep in mind that once a package is marked as .centos - it will stay as such during the life of the distro unless there are some very good reasons ( like it causes issues retaining that tag ).
what kind of issues?
On 11/10/2009 10:27 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
Keep in mind that once a package is marked as .centos - it will stay as such during the life of the distro unless there are some very good reasons ( like it causes issues retaining that tag ).
what kind of issues?
we'll know one when we hit one wont we.