CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 117, Issue 5 - devel

15 Nov 2014


      On 11/6/14, centos-devel-request@centos.org
centos-devel-request@centos.org wrote:
...
Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to
   centos-devel@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
   http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
   centos-devel-request@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
   centos-devel-owner@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..."
Today's Topics:

Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh)
Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Sameer Kumar)
Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them
(Gururaj S Alagwadi)
Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Elias Persson)
Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Jeffrey Scheel)
Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh)
Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh)


Message: 1
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 08:31:32 +0000
From: Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org
To: centos-devel@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build
   them
Message-ID: 5459E064.8090608@karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On 05/11/14 03:55, Sameer Kumar wrote:
...
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@karan.org
mailto:mail-lists@karan.org> wrote:
On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various

secondary
    > arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is
just
    > too busy to actively participate and deliver on these.
http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=v8xfphi1E please go ahead and

fill
    it out and lets make something happen next week.
?I am not sure why but I am not able to save my response. But Friday
afternoon GMT works for me.
Any heads up on what architectures we are planning to discuss?
I am going to do the demo bits on i686, but the process is overall arch
agnostic; the only special case is arm32 where the delivery path is
largely via rootfs - but were a fair distance from that.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 23:33:38 +0800
From: Sameer Kumar sameer.kumar@ashnik.com
To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." centos-devel@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build
   them
Message-ID:
   CADp-Sm6DFsgkAYokny1iykuizMik80sY4x+ySg7pKMReueYKtA@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On 5 Nov 2014 18:36, "Jeffrey Scheel" scheel@us.ibm.com wrote:
...
On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
...
There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various secondary
arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is just
too busy to actively participate and deliver on these.
Karanbir, I just requested attendance to the meeting.  Please include me
and
...
the others on the needtomeet request.  Thx,
-Jeff
Jeffrey J. Scheel
Please include me in the invite for next call.
...

CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel