Per:
http://seven.centos.org/2014/01/state-of-the-build-20140104/
I've got a bunch of BZs opened upstream (by me and others) that may help clarify the build problems you've hit:
args4j-2.0.16-11.el7.src.rpm : 1049615
at-3.1.13-12.el7.src.rpm : 1044707
dapl-2.0.34-1.el7.src.rpm : 1044727
esc-1.1.0-25.el7.src.rpm : 865721
libbase-1.1.3-8.el7.src.rpm : 1038176
istack-commons-2.17-2.el7.src.rpm : 1049582
jboss-ejb-3.1-api-1.0.2-7.el7.src.rpm : 1029971
jboss-interceptors-1.1-api-1.0.2-0.6.20120319git49a904.el7.src.rpm : 1029974
jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api-1.0.1-4.el7.src.rpm : 1029975
jboss-servlet-3.0-api-1.0.1-6.el7.src.rpm : 1029976
jboss-transaction-1.1-api-1.0.1-5.el7.src.rpm : 1029979
tomcat-7.0.40-2.el7.src.rpm : 1038183
pyliblzma-0.5.3-8.el7.src.rpm : 1044625
zsh-5.0.2-3.el7.src.rpm : 1034754 / 1037828
--- I was able to compile: apache-commons-net-3.2-7.el7.src.rpm boost-1.53.0-14.el7.src.rpm cdi-api-1.0-9.SP4.el7.src.rpm fftw-3.3.3-6.el7.src.rpm json-c-0.11-1.el7.src.rpm jsr-311-1.1.1-4.el7.src.rpm stax-ex-1.7.1-4.el7.src.rpm
These builds are 100% untested and my mock logs haven't been reviewed in any way. But they are a hint as to how we got them built. Yours if you want them, 1.3Mb tar.bz2 archive for all of them.
As for the rest, I suspect 1049615 applies to more than a few others. The maven world changed a bit between here and Fedora
On 01/09/2014 03:54 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
Per:
http://seven.centos.org/2014/01/state-of-the-build-20140104/
I've got a bunch of BZs opened upstream (by me and others) that may help clarify the build problems you've hit:
args4j-2.0.16-11.el7.src.rpm : 1049615
at-3.1.13-12.el7.src.rpm : 1044707
dapl-2.0.34-1.el7.src.rpm : 1044727
esc-1.1.0-25.el7.src.rpm : 865721
libbase-1.1.3-8.el7.src.rpm : 1038176
istack-commons-2.17-2.el7.src.rpm : 1049582
jboss-ejb-3.1-api-1.0.2-7.el7.src.rpm : 1029971
jboss-interceptors-1.1-api-1.0.2-0.6.20120319git49a904.el7.src.rpm : 1029974
jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api-1.0.1-4.el7.src.rpm : 1029975
jboss-servlet-3.0-api-1.0.1-6.el7.src.rpm : 1029976
jboss-transaction-1.1-api-1.0.1-5.el7.src.rpm : 1029979
tomcat-7.0.40-2.el7.src.rpm : 1038183
pyliblzma-0.5.3-8.el7.src.rpm : 1044625
zsh-5.0.2-3.el7.src.rpm : 1034754 / 1037828
This list is actually quite helpful. Thanks!
On 01/09/2014 11:54 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
[...]
I was able to compile: apache-commons-net-3.2-7.el7.src.rpm boost-1.53.0-14.el7.src.rpm cdi-api-1.0-9.SP4.el7.src.rpm fftw-3.3.3-6.el7.src.rpm json-c-0.11-1.el7.src.rpm jsr-311-1.1.1-4.el7.src.rpm stax-ex-1.7.1-4.el7.src.rpm
These builds are 100% untested and my mock logs haven't been reviewed in any way. But they are a hint as to how we got them built. Yours if you want them, 1.3Mb tar.bz2 archive for all of them.
I'd be more interested in the mock configs that you have used. Assuming you are willing to share them, feel free to mail them my way if you cannot upload them somewhere.
thanks
On 01/10/2014 01:26 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
These builds are 100% untested and my mock logs haven't been reviewed in any way. But they are a hint as to how we got them built. Yours if you want them, 1.3Mb tar.bz2 archive for all of them.
I'd be more interested in the mock configs that you have used. Assuming you are willing to share them, feel free to mail them my way if you cannot upload them somewhere.
I am working, as we speak here, to get our mock git repo into a public state, it might be good if we can just co-ordinate over that. Perhaps first cut can be a github hosted mirror.
So we can Merge-Request the process, rather than blocking on collaboration while user-acl is setup.
- KB
Dne 10.1.2014 02:48, Karanbir Singh napsal(a):
I am working, as we speak here, to get our mock git repo into a public state, it might be good if we can just co-ordinate over that. Perhaps first cut can be a github hosted mirror.
So we can Merge-Request the process, rather than blocking on collaboration while user-acl is setup.
- KB
Karanbir,
Are there any plans on open sourcing CentOS build toolchain above the mock? We would like to evaluate it with RepoForge.
Thanks,
David Hrbáč
On 01/10/2014 11:36 AM, David Hrbáč wrote:
Are there any plans on open sourcing CentOS build toolchain above the mock? We would like to evaluate it with RepoForge.
Sure, its not that it isnt open source, its just completely built to be run in the machine configs and setup the way we have ( making lots of assumptions ). The actual worker scripts are pretty straight forward and I can publish those.
Its essentially, much like most buildsystems just a different way of calling mock.
- KB
Dne 14.1.2014 03:28, Karanbir Singh napsal(a):
Sure, its not that it isnt open source, its just completely built to be run in the machine configs and setup the way we have ( making lots of assumptions ). The actual worker scripts are pretty straight forward and I can publish those.
Its essentially, much like most buildsystems just a different way of calling mock.
- KB
Good, so any Git repo to look at? :) DH
On 01/09/2014 07:26 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
On 01/09/2014 11:54 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
[...]
I was able to compile: apache-commons-net-3.2-7.el7.src.rpm boost-1.53.0-14.el7.src.rpm cdi-api-1.0-9.SP4.el7.src.rpm fftw-3.3.3-6.el7.src.rpm json-c-0.11-1.el7.src.rpm jsr-311-1.1.1-4.el7.src.rpm stax-ex-1.7.1-4.el7.src.rpm
These builds are 100% untested and my mock logs haven't been reviewed in any way. But they are a hint as to how we got them built. Yours if you want them, 1.3Mb tar.bz2 archive for all of them.
I'd be more interested in the mock configs that you have used. Assuming you are willing to share them, feel free to mail them my way if you cannot upload them somewhere.
thanks
I'll shoot the archive logs to you off list too.
Figure most people don't want that much overhead.
Pat
On 01/10/2014 08:25 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
On 01/09/2014 07:26 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
On 01/09/2014 11:54 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
[...]
I was able to compile: apache-commons-net-3.2-7.el7.src.rpm boost-1.53.0-14.el7.src.rpm cdi-api-1.0-9.SP4.el7.src.rpm fftw-3.3.3-6.el7.src.rpm json-c-0.11-1.el7.src.rpm jsr-311-1.1.1-4.el7.src.rpm stax-ex-1.7.1-4.el7.src.rpm
These builds are 100% untested and my mock logs haven't been reviewed in any way. But they are a hint as to how we got them built. Yours if you want them, 1.3Mb tar.bz2 archive for all of them.
I'd be more interested in the mock configs that you have used. Assuming you are willing to share them, feel free to mail them my way if you cannot upload them somewhere.
thanks
I'll shoot the archive logs to you off list too.
Figure most people don't want that much overhead.
Pat
Forgot to include my group list: koji list-groups sl7.0-beta-build build [Scientific_Linux-build] bash: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] buildsys-macros-7: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] buildsys-macros-dist-dynamic: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] bzip2: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] coreutils: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] cpio: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] diffutils: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] findutils: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] gawk: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] gcc: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] gcc-c++: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] grep: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] gzip: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] info: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] make: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] patch: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] redhat-release: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] redhat-rpm-config: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] rpm-build: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] sed: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] shadow-utils: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] tar: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] unzip: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] util-linux-ng: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] which: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] xz: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] yum: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] livecd-build [Scientific_Linux-build] bash: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] bzip2: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] coreutils: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] cpio: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] diffutils: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] findutils: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] gawk: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] gcc: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] gcc-c++: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] grep: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] gzip: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] info: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] livecd-tools: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] make: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] patch: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] policycoreutils: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] python-dbus: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] redhat-logos: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] redhat-release: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] redhat-rpm-config: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] rpm-build: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] sed: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] selinux-policy-targeted: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] shadow-utils: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] squashfs-tools: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] tar: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] unzip: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] util-linux: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] which: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] yum: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] srpm-build [Scientific_Linux-build] bash: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] curl: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] cvs: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] git: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] gnupg2: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] make: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] redhat-release: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] redhat-rpm-config: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] rpm-build: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build] shadow-utils: None, default [Scientific_Linux-build]
On 01/09/2014 03:54 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
Per:
http://seven.centos.org/2014/01/state-of-the-build-20140104/
I've got a bunch of BZs opened upstream (by me and others) that may help clarify the build problems you've hit:
args4j-2.0.16-11.el7.src.rpm : 1049615
at-3.1.13-12.el7.src.rpm : 1044707
dapl-2.0.34-1.el7.src.rpm : 1044727
esc-1.1.0-25.el7.src.rpm : 865721
libbase-1.1.3-8.el7.src.rpm : 1038176
istack-commons-2.17-2.el7.src.rpm : 1049582
jboss-ejb-3.1-api-1.0.2-7.el7.src.rpm : 1029971
jboss-interceptors-1.1-api-1.0.2-0.6.20120319git49a904.el7.src.rpm : 1029974
jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api-1.0.1-4.el7.src.rpm : 1029975
jboss-servlet-3.0-api-1.0.1-6.el7.src.rpm : 1029976
jboss-transaction-1.1-api-1.0.1-5.el7.src.rpm : 1029979
tomcat-7.0.40-2.el7.src.rpm : 1038183
pyliblzma-0.5.3-8.el7.src.rpm : 1044625
zsh-5.0.2-3.el7.src.rpm : 1034754 / 1037828
I was able to compile: apache-commons-net-3.2-7.el7.src.rpm boost-1.53.0-14.el7.src.rpm cdi-api-1.0-9.SP4.el7.src.rpm fftw-3.3.3-6.el7.src.rpm json-c-0.11-1.el7.src.rpm jsr-311-1.1.1-4.el7.src.rpm stax-ex-1.7.1-4.el7.src.rpm
These builds are 100% untested and my mock logs haven't been reviewed in any way. But they are a hint as to how we got them built. Yours if you want them, 1.3Mb tar.bz2 archive for all of them.
As for the rest, I suspect 1049615 applies to more than a few others. The maven world changed a bit between here and Fedora
I should probably follow up with the first change I've found in the maven world is on maven-plugin-bundle. On Fedora it requires felix-parent, but not on EL7.
I've just disclosed about 90% of what I know about maven in total. The java world has never been an area of focus for me.
Pat