The first lot of pkgs for webstack on CentOS-5 will start showing up on the testing repo shortly. Its setup to push packages every 12 hrs, so you will see some churn in the repo.
File issue reports at : http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3106
All feedback is welcome, specially from people who can test the packages and confirm that they work as expected.
Karanbir Singh napsal(a):
The first lot of pkgs for webstack on CentOS-5 will start showing up on the testing repo shortly. Its setup to push packages every 12 hrs, so you will see some churn in the repo.
File issue reports at : http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3106
All feedback is welcome, specially from people who can test the packages and confirm that they work as expected.
Karanbir, comparing CPlus C4 and C5, postgres 8.1.9->8.2.6, php 5.1.6->5.2.3, mysql 5.0.62->5.0.56 Would you please update mysql too? DH
Hi David,
David Hrbác wrote:
comparing CPlus C4 and C5, postgres 8.1.9->8.2.6, php 5.1.6->5.2.3, mysql 5.0.62->5.0.56 Would you please update mysql too? DH
5.0.56 isnt a part of the webstack :D, and I've got 5.1.x rc and 5.0.62 done for c5 in the mix, they should both show up in the next few days.
comparing CPlus C4 and C5, postgres 8.1.9->8.2.6, php 5.1.6->5.2.3, mysql 5.0.62->5.0.56 Would you please update mysql too? DH
5.0.56 isnt a part of the webstack :D, and I've got 5.1.x rc and 5.0.62 done for c5 in the mix, they should both show up in the next few days.
in the past it has been talked about to make the webstack a separate repo from centoplus (or maybe it was a sub-repo?). anyway, i'd vote for keeping the upstream webstack isolated so that people can install just that and not get some other mysql without explicitly asking for that.
i understand that the testing repo is more a free-for-all so i just have to be careful what i do.
Karanbir Singh napsal(a):
5.0.56 isnt a part of the webstack :D, and I've got 5.1.x rc and 5.0.62 done for c5 in the mix, they should both show up in the next few days.
Ok. As to postgre. I guess it'd be fine to upgrade to 8.2.10, see http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.1003 Resolves a lot of bug. DH
The first lot of pkgs for webstack on CentOS-5 will start showing up on the testing repo shortly. Its setup to push packages every 12 hrs, so you will see some churn in the repo.
File issue reports at : http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3106
All feedback is welcome, specially from people who can test the packages and confirm that they work as expected.
will you be building the 2.2.8 httpd from rhwas? and in relation to my last post, will you build the mysql from rhwas?
Joe Pruett wrote:
will you be building the 2.2.8 httpd from rhwas? and in relation to my last post, will you build the mysql from rhwas?
yes, yes.
The first lot of pkgs for webstack on CentOS-5 will start showing up on the testing repo shortly. Its setup to push packages every 12 hrs, so you will see some churn in the repo.
i imagine you're still trying to get 4.7 out the door... i'm still waiting for httpd, mysql, etc to be built from the rhwas srpms.
Joe Pruett wrote:
The first lot of pkgs for webstack on CentOS-5 will start showing up on the testing repo shortly. Its setup to push packages every 12 hrs, so you will see some churn in the repo.
i imagine you're still trying to get 4.7 out the door... i'm still waiting for httpd, mysql, etc to be built from the rhwas srpms.
yes, been quite busy with work and infrastructure work in *.centos.org - give me a day or so, will try and catchup with the all the rhwas stuff this weekend.
Thanks for the patience!
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Joe Pruett wrote:
The first lot of pkgs for webstack on CentOS-5 will start showing up on the testing repo shortly. Its setup to push packages every 12 hrs, so you will see some churn in the repo.
i imagine you're still trying to get 4.7 out the door... i'm still waiting for httpd, mysql, etc to be built from the rhwas srpms.
yes, been quite busy with work and infrastructure work in *.centos.org - give me a day or so, will try and catchup with the all the rhwas stuff this weekend.
Time to start delegating work ? >:)
Dag Wieers wrote:
yes, been quite busy with work and infrastructure work in *.centos.org
- give me a day or so, will try and catchup with the all the rhwas
stuff this weekend.
Time to start delegating work ? >:)
That very specific thing is happening right now actually. We just need more people to step up who wont promise a lot, delivery almost nothing and then just go away next weekend.
so karanbir, do you have some time to go back to this now? i'm still wanting to see the http, mysql, etc to be rebuilt from rhwas. i don't care about the java stuff right now.
Joe Pruett wrote:
so karanbir, do you have some time to go back to this now? i'm still wanting to see the http, mysql, etc to be rebuilt from rhwas. i don't care about the java stuff right now.
Those pkgs were published a few days back, make sure you are looking at the c5-testing repo.
w.r.t mysql, am working on something even more fun. look for into on that in a day or so :D
Those pkgs were published a few days back, make sure you are looking at the c5-testing repo.
w.r.t mysql, am working on something even more fun. look for into on that in a day or so :D
i am looking at the x86_64 area: http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/
and i don't see any httpd in there.
as for the mysql stuff, i'll repeat my suggestion of keeping the rhwas separate from other, even newer versions of mysql. what i want to do is replicate a rhwas environment. for testing, it is fine to mix things all together, but i still think a webstack repo or the like will be the best long term solution.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Joe Pruett joey@clean.q7.com wrote:
Those pkgs were published a few days back, make sure you are looking at the c5-testing repo.
w.r.t mysql, am working on something even more fun. look for into on that in a day or so :D
i am looking at the x86_64 area: http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/
and i don't see any httpd in there.
Look in:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/
I think you should be using the testing repo.
yum list --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=c5-testing httpd
will find it.
Available Packages httpd.x86_64 2.2.8-1.el5s2.centos c5-testing
Akemi
Look in:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/
I think you should be using the testing repo.
yum list --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=c5-testing httpd
will find it.
Available Packages httpd.x86_64 2.2.8-1.el5s2.centos c5-testing
yep, things weren't where i expected to see them so i didn't even try yum.
Look in:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/
I think you should be using the testing repo.
yum list --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=c5-testing httpd
will find it.
Available Packages httpd.x86_64 2.2.8-1.el5s2.centos c5-testing
yep, things weren't where i expected to see them so i didn't even try yum.
these packages from rhwas don't seem to be there: mysql-5.0.50sp1a-2.el5s2 perl-DBD-Pg-1.49-2.el5s2 unixODBC-2.2.12-8.el5s2
since there is a newer version of mysql in the repo, i don't know how you get yum to do that other than manual downloading.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Joe Pruett joey@clean.q7.com wrote:
Look in:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/
I think you should be using the testing repo.
yum list --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=c5-testing httpd
will find it.
Available Packages httpd.x86_64 2.2.8-1.el5s2.centos c5-testing
yep, things weren't where i expected to see them so i didn't even try yum.
these packages from rhwas don't seem to be there: mysql-5.0.50sp1a-2.el5s2 perl-DBD-Pg-1.49-2.el5s2 unixODBC-2.2.12-8.el5s2
since there is a newer version of mysql in the repo, i don't know how you get yum to do that other than manual downloading.
From what I [over]heard, Karanbir is "working on" mysql...
Akemi
From what I [over]heard, Karanbir is "working on" mysql...
it wasn't clear if he was building the mysql from rhwas or a different version. i guess we'll see. the perl-dbi-pg and unixodbc aren't important to me, but i figured i'd compare all the non-java stuff just to be complete.
these packages from rhwas don't seem to be there: mysql-5.0.50sp1a-2.el5s2 perl-DBD-Pg-1.49-2.el5s2 unixODBC-2.2.12-8.el5s2
and some sub-packages don't seem to have updated versions:
php-mcrypt.x86_64 5.1.6-15.el5.centos.1 installed php-mhash.x86_64 5.1.6-15.el5.centos.1 installed php-mssql.x86_64 5.1.6-15.el5.centos.1 installed php-readline.x86_64 5.1.6-15.el5.centos.1 installed php-tidy.x86_64 5.1.6-15.el5.centos.1 installed
the pear and pecl sub-packages don't seem to have new versions either, but i don't know if that is an issue.
i am guessing the php sub-packages are because of the unknown --with or --define options that i've been asking about.
Joe Pruett wrote:
i am looking at the x86_64 area: http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/
and i don't see any httpd in there.
ok, worth investigating what is going on then.
- KB
Karanbir Singh napsal(a):
Joe Pruett wrote:
i am looking at the x86_64 area: http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/
and i don't see any httpd in there.
ok, worth investigating what is going on then.
- KB
Well, packages are messed up over the folder. Loo http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/i386/, there should be directories only. DH
David Hrbác wrote:
ok, worth investigating what is going on then.
- KB
Well, packages are messed up over the folder. Loo http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/i386/, there should be directories only.
Thats not a problem per-se, since I'd expect people to look at the repomedata that does have all the stuff.
One of the things that I am working on is isolating package groups in the testing repo, so that people would / could use just a specific set ( sort of like meta-repos' ) while the main testing repo would contain everything.
This is mainly to address the issue that Ralph raised - CentOS-DS is in the testing repo, and cant go away, while there are other packages in there that might need to be cleaned, but have no connection with the CentOS-DS package set etc.
More info on that once I can get my head around exactly how we might code this up on the build-service side of things.
Thanks for looking though.
- KB