Hi there, I made wine 1.2 packages for centos. I would like to share them but i don't have a public repository. Is there a place, where i could upload this packages. Maybe someone else would need them too.
The packages are built to my needs, so they don't have winetricks or desktop integration, but they work.
Regards Janez
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
I made wine 1.2 packages for centos. I would like to share them but i don't have a public repository. Is there a place, where i could upload this packages. Maybe someone else would need them too.
The packages are built to my needs, so they don't have winetricks or desktop integration, but they work.
Hmm, I stopped doing wine (1.1.x) packages after it required newer versions of base packages which I couldn't satisfy. I guess this is no longer true.
I will see if I can rebuild them for RPMforge again.
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
I made wine 1.2 packages for centos. I would like to share them but i don't have a public repository. Is there a place, where i could upload this packages. Maybe someone else would need them too.
The packages are built to my needs, so they don't have winetricks or desktop integration, but they work.
Hmm, I stopped doing wine (1.1.x) packages after it required newer versions of base packages which I couldn't satisfy. I guess this is no longer true.
I will see if I can rebuild them for RPMforge again.
Ok, the details are:
checking for flex... flex checking whether flex is recent enough... no configure: error: Your flex version is too old. Please install flex version 2.5.33 or newer.
So I guess you build a newer version of flex in order to build a newer version of wine, right ?
I have been playing with the idea myself to have a separate 'build' repository in RPMforge that replaces a few of the 'older' buildtools. It would allow us to rebuild some software without pulling new requirements that replace base packages.
(flex and make come to mind, there were a few others)
It could be:
.rf. rpmforge stable .rfb. rpmforge buildtools .rft. rpmforge testing
What do people think ?
On 08/12/2010 12:52 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
I made wine 1.2 packages for centos. I would like to share them but i don't have a public repository. Is there a place, where i could upload this packages. Maybe someone else would need them too.
The packages are built to my needs, so they don't have winetricks or desktop integration, but they work.
Hmm, I stopped doing wine (1.1.x) packages after it required newer versions of base packages which I couldn't satisfy. I guess this is no longer true.
I will see if I can rebuild them for RPMforge again.
Ok, the details are:
checking for flex... flex checking whether flex is recent enough... no configure: error: Your flex version is too old. Please install flex version 2.5.33 or newer.
So I guess you build a newer version of flex in order to build a newer version of wine, right ?
I have been playing with the idea myself to have a separate 'build' repository in RPMforge that replaces a few of the 'older' buildtools. It would allow us to rebuild some software without pulling new requirements that replace base packages.
(flex and make come to mind, there were a few others)
It could be:
.rf. rpmforge stable .rfb. rpmforge buildtools .rft. rpmforge testing
What do people think ?
as long as the final packages do not require updating the core packages I see nothing wrong in using newer tools to build them. of course, having the BRs in a separate repo so that others can use them is even nicer.
Ok, the details are:
checking for flex... flex checking whether flex is recent enough... no configure: error: Your flex version is too old. Please install flex version 2.5.33 or newer.
So I guess you build a newer version of flex in order to build a newer version of wine, right ?
I have been playing with the idea myself to have a separate 'build' repository in RPMforge that replaces a few of the 'older' buildtools. It would allow us to rebuild some software without pulling new requirements that replace base packages.
(flex and make come to mind, there were a few others)
It could be:
.rf. rpmforge stable .rfb. rpmforge buildtools .rft. rpmforge testingWhat do people think ?
-- -- dag wieers, dag@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
It required a newer flex version to build. I took the fedora 7 version, which is new enough and it installs on centos 5.5 without complaining for dependencies. If you do some patching to the official version, it also requires a newer autoconf version.
Also for instalation it requires nss-mdns package, which i got from ATrpms.
-
Dag Wieers -
Janez Kosmrlj -
Manuel Wolfshant