Is there a schedule for when the remaining SIGs will populate vault.centos.org? SCLO is a notable missing piece
Neale
On 11/02/2021 01:28, Neale Ferguson wrote:
Is there a schedule for when the remaining SIGs will populate vault.centos.org? SCLO is a notable missing piece
Can you come with some specific example in mind ? (and worth asking the SCLo guys , hopefully they read mails on centos-devel list)
I see src.rpm pgks pushed to https://vault.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/Source/rh/ and https://vault.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/Source/sclo/ though
Oops, sorry sclo wasn't the one in question. It was opstools is empty.
Neale Ferguson
On 2/11/21, 16:23, "CentOS-devel on behalf of Fabian Arrotin" <centos-devel-bounces@centos.org on behalf of arrfab@centos.org> wrote:
Can you come with some specific example in mind ? (and worth asking the SCLo guys , hopefully they read mails on centos-devel list)
Actually, I take that back. Compare 7.8.2003 and 7.9.2009 from a local copy of vault -
# ls 7.8.2003/sclo/Source/rh/devtoolset-9 devtoolset-9-9.0-3.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-elfutils-0.176-5.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-oprofile-1.3.0-4.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-annobin-8.79-2.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-gcc-9.1.1-2.6.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-strace-5.1-4.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-binutils-2.32-14.el7.1.src.rpm devtoolset-9-gdb-8.3-3.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-systemtap-4.1-7.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-binutils-2.32-14.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-ltrace-0.7.91-1.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-valgrind-3.15.0-9.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-dwz-0.12-1.1.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-make-4.2.1-1.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-dyninst-10.1.0-4.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-memstomp-0.1.5-5.el7.src.rpm # ls 7.9.2009/sclo/Source/rh/devtoolset-9 #
I've verified this is the same on the vault.centos.org site.
Neale
On 2/11/21, 16:36, "CentOS-devel on behalf of Neale Ferguson" <centos-devel-bounces@centos.org on behalf of neale@sinenomine.net> wrote:
Oops, sorry sclo wasn't the one in question. It was opstools is empty.
Neale Ferguson
On 2/11/21, 16:23, "CentOS-devel on behalf of Fabian Arrotin" <centos-devel-bounces@centos.org on behalf of arrfab@centos.org> wrote:
Can you come with some specific example in mind ? (and worth asking the SCLo guys , hopefully they read mails on centos-devel list)
_______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
On 11/02/2021 07:55, Neale Ferguson wrote:
Actually, I take that back. Compare 7.8.2003 and 7.9.2009 from a local copy of vault -
# ls 7.8.2003/sclo/Source/rh/devtoolset-9 devtoolset-9-9.0-3.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-elfutils-0.176-5.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-oprofile-1.3.0-4.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-annobin-8.79-2.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-gcc-9.1.1-2.6.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-strace-5.1-4.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-binutils-2.32-14.el7.1.src.rpm devtoolset-9-gdb-8.3-3.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-systemtap-4.1-7.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-binutils-2.32-14.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-ltrace-0.7.91-1.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-valgrind-3.15.0-9.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-dwz-0.12-1.1.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-make-4.2.1-1.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-dyninst-10.1.0-4.el7.src.rpm devtoolset-9-memstomp-0.1.5-5.el7.src.rpm # ls 7.9.2009/sclo/Source/rh/devtoolset-9 #
From a SIG "sign and push" perspective, there is no 7.8.2003 nor
7.9.2009 as it's always pushing only to Major (so 7 in this case) and it seems that source packages you mentioned are listed there ?
=> https://vault.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/Source/rh/
-
Fabian Arrotin -
Neale Ferguson