Greetings All!
Time for another Storage SIG meeting [1] . We will be meeting in #centos-devel on Freenode.
Agenda: #info Topic: Action items from previous meeting #info Topic: Status Updates #info Subtopic: GlusterFS #info Subtopic: OpenAFS #info Subtopic: Ceph #info Subtopic: SCST #info Open Floor
Action items from previous meetings:
1. lalatenduM to document the process of pkg building and moving them to storage sig repos 2. billings to try out reimzul's way of kmod building and yum priorities stuff for openafs repo 3. alphacc to validate the storage7 koji targets and setup new tags as needed for openafs 4. lalatenduM and billings will discuss about the current targets and tags for storage sig 5. kbsingh to see if openafs is GPL compatible or not 6. lalatenduM will help deason to get standard policy or guidance on packaging selinux rules 7. alphacc to give cbs access to scuttlemonkey refer https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=8095 8. lalatenduM going to send a mail to centos devel and gluster MLs abt glusterfs test repo availability
Thanks, Lala
On 02/19/2015 06:31 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
Greetings All!
Time for another Storage SIG meeting [1] . We will be meeting in #centos-devel on Freenode.
Agenda: #info Topic: Action items from previous meeting #info Topic: Status Updates #info Subtopic: GlusterFS #info Subtopic: OpenAFS #info Subtopic: Ceph #info Subtopic: SCST #info Open Floor
Meeting minutes and links to complete log.
========================= #centos-devel: StorageSIG =========================
Meeting started by lalatenduM at 15:30:05 UTC. The full logs are available at centos-devel/2015/centos-devel.2015-02-20-15.30.log.html .
Meeting summary --------------- * rollcall (lalatenduM, 15:30:18)
* Action items from last meeting (lalatenduM, 15:31:52) * ACTION: lalatenduM to document the process of pkg building and moving them to storage sig repos (lalatenduM, 15:32:34) * ACTION: billings to try out reimzul's way of kmod building and yum priorities stuff for openafs repo (lalatenduM, 15:35:32) * ACTION: alphacc to validate the storage7 koji targets and setup new tags as needed for openafs (lalatenduM, 15:36:24) * ACTION: lalatenduM and billings will discuss about the current targets and tags for storage sig (lalatenduM, 15:37:04) * ACTION: kbsingh to see if openafs is GPL compatible or not (lalatenduM, 15:39:35) * ACTION: lalatenduM will help deason to get standard policy or guidance on packaging selinux rules (lalatenduM, 15:39:55) * ACTION: lalatenduM to start a discussion in centos-devel around standard policy or guidance on packaging selinux rules (lalatenduM, 15:42:54)
* status-updates (lalatenduM, 15:43:40)
* GlusterFS (lalatenduM, 15:43:52) * ACTION: lalatenduM to get ndevos kkeithley_ to request for cbs access via the bugs.c.o interface (lalatenduM, 16:00:56)
* ceph status (lalatenduM, 16:01:40)
* SCST status (lalatenduM, 16:02:46) * ACTION: bvanassche to split the SCST spec into two spec files - one for DKMS (without kernel version in its name) and one for generating binary RPMs (with kernel version in the RPM name0) (lalatenduM, 16:08:23)
* OpenAFS status (lalatenduM, 16:11:14)
* open floor (lalatenduM, 16:12:33)
* GSOC ideas for Storage SIG (lalatenduM, 16:12:58)
Meeting ended at 16:20:00 UTC.
Action Items ------------ * lalatenduM to document the process of pkg building and moving them to storage sig repos * billings to try out reimzul's way of kmod building and yum priorities stuff for openafs repo * alphacc to validate the storage7 koji targets and setup new tags as needed for openafs * lalatenduM and billings will discuss about the current targets and tags for storage sig * kbsingh to see if openafs is GPL compatible or not * lalatenduM will help deason to get standard policy or guidance on packaging selinux rules * lalatenduM to start a discussion in centos-devel around standard policy or guidance on packaging selinux rules * lalatenduM to get ndevos kkeithley_ to request for cbs access via the bugs.c.o interface * bvanassche to split the SCST spec into two spec files - one for DKMS (without kernel version in its name) and one for generating binary RPMs (with kernel version in the RPM name0)
People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * lalatenduM (109) * kbsingh (32) * JustinClift (29) * bvanassche (26) * centbot (5) * ndevos (2)
Logs to meeting minutes and complete logs:
http://www.centos.org/minutes/2015/february/centos-devel.2015-02-20-15.30.ht... http://www.centos.org/minutes/2015/february/centos-devel.2015-02-20-15.30.lo... http://www.centos.org/minutes/2015/february/centos-devel.2015-02-20-15.30.lo... http://www.centos.org/minutes/2015/february/centos-devel.2015-02-20-15.30.tx...
Thanks, Lala
On 02/23/15 06:50, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
Action Items
- bvanassche to split the SCST spec into two spec files - one for DKMS (without kernel version in its name) and one for generating binary RPMs (with kernel version in the RPM name)
This action item is complete (see also http://sourceforge.net/p/scst/svn/6125/). However, there is a challenge: if I submit an SCST source RPM to the koji build system that source RPM is built against the base kernel RPM instead of the latest update (e.g. kernel RPM release 123.el7 instead of 123.20.1.el7 for CentOS 7). Advice for how to address this would certainly be welcome ...
Thanks,
Bart.