Hi,
Do we have a list of things that need to get done before the repos hosted at SoftwareCollections.org can go away to be replaced with properly maintained content from centos.org ?
crossposting,
- KB
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 10/02/15 10:00, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
Do we have a list of things that need to get done before the repos hosted at SoftwareCollections.org can go away to be replaced with properly maintained content from centos.org ?
crossposting,
- KB
Hi,
Noticed there is not much movement on the whole SCL Sig thing, just wondering if you guys needed an extra set of hands?
I'll be willing to volunteer some of my time if it helps get SCL Sig ready to go :-).
I have experience in RPM packaging, although only locally via Mock, however I'm sure there isn't a whole lot of difference, and what changes there are I could learn.
If it is something else you guys need help with, let me know I'll see if I can help.
Figured it's the least I can do as I currently use CentOS on all our systems at work and at home, it'd be my way of giving something back :-).
Kind Regards, Jake Shipton (JakeMS) Twitter: @CrazyLinuxNerd GPG Key: 0xE3C31D8F GPG Fingerprint: 7515 CC63 19BD 06F9 400A DE8A 1D0B A5CF E3C3 1D8F
On 02/10/2015 10:54 PM, Jake Shipton wrote:
On 10/02/15 10:00, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
Do we have a list of things that need to get done before the repos hosted at SoftwareCollections.org can go away to be replaced with properly maintained content from centos.org ?
crossposting,
- KB
Hi,
Noticed there is not much movement on the whole SCL Sig thing, just wondering if you guys needed an extra set of hands?
Always need extra hands! Can you come along to the next SCL meetup on irc ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 10/02/15 22:56, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 02/10/2015 10:54 PM, Jake Shipton wrote:
On 10/02/15 10:00, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
Do we have a list of things that need to get done before the repos hosted at SoftwareCollections.org can go away to be replaced with properly maintained content from centos.org ?
crossposting,
- KB
Hi,
Noticed there is not much movement on the whole SCL Sig thing, just wondering if you guys needed an extra set of hands?
Always need extra hands! Can you come along to the next SCL meetup on irc ?
Hi,
That depends on the time and date.
Although, I am on Freenode IRC (JakeMS), so if it is at a time I can make I'll be there :-).
Kind Regards, Jake Shipton (JakeMS) Twitter: @CrazyLinuxNerd GPG Key: 0xE3C31D8F GPG Fingerprint: 7515 CC63 19BD 06F9 400A DE8A 1D0B A5CF E3C3 1D8F
Hi Jake,
we have a sync-up meeting on Wednesdays (4pm UTC) on #centos-devel, which means we should have a meeting today but I've just realized I won't be available at that time, so only if anybody else organizes the meeting you could start there today. Otherwise, meet us the next week.
Besides that, I expect more action after these conference-recovering time is over, especially on sclorg@redhat.com [1], which is a good idea to join.
[1] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
Honza
On 02/11/2015 12:03 AM, Jake Shipton wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 10/02/15 22:56, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 02/10/2015 10:54 PM, Jake Shipton wrote:
On 10/02/15 10:00, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
Do we have a list of things that need to get done before the repos hosted at SoftwareCollections.org can go away to be replaced with properly maintained content from centos.org ?
crossposting,
- KB
Hi,
Noticed there is not much movement on the whole SCL Sig thing, just wondering if you guys needed an extra set of hands?
Always need extra hands! Can you come along to the next SCL meetup on irc ?
Hi,
That depends on the time and date.
Although, I am on Freenode IRC (JakeMS), so if it is at a time I can make I'll be there :-).
Kind Regards, Jake Shipton (JakeMS) Twitter: @CrazyLinuxNerd GPG Key: 0xE3C31D8F GPG Fingerprint: 7515 CC63 19BD 06F9 400A DE8A 1D0B A5CF E3C3 1D8F -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU2o43AAoJEB0Lpc/jwx2Pua8H/iK+Niz/TRTu9ug45Yq9CkwN ZfF9Ctv2Zrnf0hNZv70PuyoDi6cdpj1DolEIIylgGxlxEQDBD+wO2xyHt3b1nQCB eWlEW3E1MaPuxPh423xA5PJ/ztNxdkRsTVerbLBa9R+ZCJWzzOYX3C3lWVWjktgF jcWOq7iTmw27/UkNxCrt6Ho5F3rE8gS0i+cYDYllBLlAFNa+Dn6M1g1PoC5iz/uh L0eoKSud27oWtPn+txE1SMOuMvLat+Z1LBO/VHJOCjTq6ZAb4WbfsMLNNUSpKVJS bG8ezFzWttQ3JuIp0m+P0ZwobHdvO948j7ftg8B6XrStmd/qhGooqxx81cPwYFk= =03K+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/15 13:30, Honza Horak wrote:
Hi Jake,
we have a sync-up meeting on Wednesdays (4pm UTC) on #centos-devel, which means we should have a meeting today but I've just realized I won't be available at that time, so only if anybody else organizes the meeting you could start there today. Otherwise, meet us the next week.
Besides that, I expect more action after these conference-recovering time is over, especially on sclorg@redhat.com [1], which is a good idea to join.
[1] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
Honza
Hi,
Thanks for the info. Wednesdays 4PM GMT shouldn't be a problem for me as it's my day off anyhow.
I'll join that other list shortly :-).
Kind Regards, Jake Shipton (JakeMS) Twitter: @CrazyLinuxNerd GPG Key: 0xE3C31D8F GPG Fingerprint: 7515 CC63 19BD 06F9 400A DE8A 1D0B A5CF E3C3 1D8F
On 02/10/2015 11:00 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
Do we have a list of things that need to get done before the repos hosted at SoftwareCollections.org can go away to be replaced with properly maintained content from centos.org ?
There are two things we identified as blocking us at [1]: a. authtag -- thing that allows non-admin users to push/import srpms into rpms/ namespace b. centpkg build ready with all features hacked
Anybody knows about progress with those?
As soon as we have (a) we can import srpms into centos (should be script-able). Then, as soon as we have (b) and all packages built, we can remove copr-built RPMs from scl.org and import bits from centos.
However, there is also one feature missing on scl.org, which is to be able to import builds that were not built in copr. This is actually stuff for scl.org guys. We talked about it today and it seems there are more possible ways how to do this, we just need to figure out which is the best. This will be elaborated a bit in a separate thread.
[1] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-January/012678.html
Honza
On 02/11/2015 02:25 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 02/10/2015 11:00 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
Do we have a list of things that need to get done before the repos hosted at SoftwareCollections.org can go away to be replaced with properly maintained content from centos.org ?
There are two things we identified as blocking us at [1]: a. authtag -- thing that allows non-admin users to push/import srpms into rpms/ namespace b. centpkg build ready with all features hacked
Well, Remi actually brought me to reconsidering a bit if we actually really need those two things to start building collections -- we can build from srpm and have collections in sclX-testing repo right now actually.
Then, we can rebuild from koji once the auth/centpkg is ready. That way we won't have signed packages and have anything in scl7-release (where only builds from scm can be placed, as I understood, is it correct?), but we may be fine with that for now.
Does it make sense?
Still cross-posting :) but would prefer to move to sclorg@redhat.com..
Honza
Anybody knows about progress with those?
As soon as we have (a) we can import srpms into centos (should be script-able). Then, as soon as we have (b) and all packages built, we can remove copr-built RPMs from scl.org and import bits from centos.
However, there is also one feature missing on scl.org, which is to be able to import builds that were not built in copr. This is actually stuff for scl.org guys. We talked about it today and it seems there are more possible ways how to do this, we just need to figure out which is the best. This will be elaborated a bit in a separate thread.
[1] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-January/012678.html
Honza
SCLorg mailing list SCLorg@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
On 02/11/2015 11:39 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 02/11/2015 02:25 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 02/10/2015 11:00 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
Do we have a list of things that need to get done before the repos hosted at SoftwareCollections.org can go away to be replaced with properly maintained content from centos.org ?
There are two things we identified as blocking us at [1]: a. authtag -- thing that allows non-admin users to push/import srpms into rpms/ namespace b. centpkg build ready with all features hacked
Well, Remi actually brought me to reconsidering a bit if we actually really need those two things to start building collections -- we can build from srpm and have collections in sclX-testing repo right now actually.
Then, we can rebuild from koji once the auth/centpkg is ready. That way we won't have signed packages and have anything in scl7-release (where only builds from scm can be placed, as I understood, is it correct?), but we may be fine with that for now.
Does it make sense?
Still cross-posting :) but would prefer to move to sclorg@redhat.com..
Yes, that makes sense to me and sounds reasonable.
On 11/02/15 19:16, Jim Perrin wrote:
On 02/11/2015 11:39 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 02/11/2015 02:25 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 02/10/2015 11:00 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
Do we have a list of things that need to get done before the repos hosted at SoftwareCollections.org can go away to be replaced with properly maintained content from centos.org ?
There are two things we identified as blocking us at [1]: a. authtag -- thing that allows non-admin users to push/import srpms into rpms/ namespace b. centpkg build ready with all features hacked
Well, Remi actually brought me to reconsidering a bit if we actually really need those two things to start building collections -- we can build from srpm and have collections in sclX-testing repo right now actually.
Then, we can rebuild from koji once the auth/centpkg is ready. That way we won't have signed packages and have anything in scl7-release (where only builds from scm can be placed, as I understood, is it correct?), but we may be fine with that for now.
Does it make sense?
Still cross-posting :) but would prefer to move to sclorg@redhat.com..
Yes, that makes sense to me and sounds reasonable.
works for me too - it does mean I need to do some ( help with ) a few of the bits manually, but am willing to do that while we bring the rest of the pipeline in shape.
- KB
-
Honza Horak -
Jake Shipton -
Jim Perrin -
Karanbir Singh -
Karanbir Singh