-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Did others notic there seems to be a problem with ldconfig on Centos 5?
It got apparant with the latest clamav update of rpmforge but it seems that ldconfig does not bild all the information that is required.
Or as the report read on the MailScanner mailinglist:
And some more fun:
[root@liquidity lib]# rm libclamunrar.so.6 libclamunrar_iface.so.6 rm: remove symbolic link `libclamunrar.so.6'? y rm: remove symbolic link `libclamunrar_iface.so.6'? y [root@liquidity lib]# ls -lra libclamunrar* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 142039 Mar 27 17:45 libclamunrar.so.6.0.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24434 Mar 27 17:45 libclamunrar_iface.so.6.0.2 [root@liquidity lib]# ldconfig -v | grep unrar libclamunrar.so.6 -> libclamunrar.so.6.0.2 (changed) libclamunrar_iface.so.6 -> libclamunrar_iface.so.6.0.2 (changed) [root@liquidity lib]# ls -lra libclamunrar* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 142039 Mar 27 17:45 libclamunrar.so.6.0.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Apr 1 17:24 libclamunrar.so.6 -> libclamunrar.so.6.0.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24434 Mar 27 17:45 libclamunrar_iface.so.6.0.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Apr 1 17:24 libclamunrar_iface.so.6 -> libclamunrar_iface.so.6.0.2
The issue doesn't appear to be isolated to just ClamAV, though. Look in your libs and delete any linked .so file and re-run ldconfig. The .so isn't recreated.
[root@liquidity lib]# rm libbeecrypt.so libbeecrypt.so.6 rm: remove symbolic link `libbeecrypt.so'? y rm: remove symbolic link `libbeecrypt.so.6'? y [root@liquidity lib]# ldconfig -v | grep libbeecr libbeecrypt.so.6 -> libbeecrypt.so.6.4.0 (changed) [root@liquidity lib]# ls -lra libbeecrypt* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 251704 Jan 6 2007 libbeecrypt.so.6.4.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Apr 1 17:25 libbeecrypt.so.6 -> libbeecrypt.so.6.4.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 833 Jan 6 2007 libbeecrypt.la -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 340262 Jan 6 2007 libbeecrypt.a
Is this something that needs to be reported upstream? Or is it Centos 5 specific?
Hugo.
- -- hvdkooij@vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
On Apr 1, 2009, at 5:43 PM, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Did others notic there seems to be a problem with ldconfig on Centos 5?
Hmmm, its not the responsibility of ldconfig to recreate *.so files afaik.
It got apparant with the latest clamav update of rpmforge but it seems that ldconfig does not bild all the information that is required.
What information is missing? Does clamav have a DT_SONAME (see readelf.a)
Note also that rpm can fail to run ldconfig while upgrading. The very last ldconfig in a transaction can be skipped wrongly if the packages happen to be arranged that way.
Run /sbin/ldconfig manually if that bothers.
73 de Jeff
Or as the report read on the MailScanner mailinglist:
And some more fun:
[root@liquidity lib]# rm libclamunrar.so.6 libclamunrar_iface.so.6 rm: remove symbolic link `libclamunrar.so.6'? y rm: remove symbolic link `libclamunrar_iface.so.6'? y [root@liquidity lib]# ls -lra libclamunrar* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 142039 Mar 27 17:45 libclamunrar.so.6.0.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24434 Mar 27 17:45 libclamunrar_iface.so. 6.0.2 [root@liquidity lib]# ldconfig -v | grep unrar libclamunrar.so.6 -> libclamunrar.so.6.0.2 (changed) libclamunrar_iface.so.6 -> libclamunrar_iface.so.6.0.2 (changed) [root@liquidity lib]# ls -lra libclamunrar* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 142039 Mar 27 17:45 libclamunrar.so.6.0.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Apr 1 17:24 libclamunrar.so.6 -> libclamunrar.so.6.0.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24434 Mar 27 17:45 libclamunrar_iface.so. 6.0.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Apr 1 17:24 libclamunrar_iface.so.6 -> libclamunrar_iface.so.6.0.2
The issue doesn't appear to be isolated to just ClamAV, though. Look in your libs and delete any linked .so file and re-run ldconfig. The .so isn't recreated.
[root@liquidity lib]# rm libbeecrypt.so libbeecrypt.so.6 rm: remove symbolic link `libbeecrypt.so'? y rm: remove symbolic link `libbeecrypt.so.6'? y [root@liquidity lib]# ldconfig -v | grep libbeecr libbeecrypt.so.6 -> libbeecrypt.so.6.4.0 (changed) [root@liquidity lib]# ls -lra libbeecrypt* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 251704 Jan 6 2007 libbeecrypt.so.6.4.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Apr 1 17:25 libbeecrypt.so.6 -> libbeecrypt.so.6.4.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 833 Jan 6 2007 libbeecrypt.la -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 340262 Jan 6 2007 libbeecrypt.a
Is this something that needs to be reported upstream? Or is it Centos 5 specific?
Hugo.
hvdkooij@vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAknT4AgACgkQBvzDRVjxmYEA5QCgrGnY/e5/0bWXRi6jEJI6ByPf LvoAn23lt58ucrqSv9WcUpu/e0qZGblg =Mms2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-
Hugo van der Kooij -
Jeff Johnson