Hello. Does CentOS have plans to release a build of Redhat MRG? If not, please, please consider doing it.
_________________________________________________________________ Drag n’ drop—Get easy photo sharing with Windows Live™ Photos.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/photos.aspx
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, V Srikanth wrote:
Hello. Does CentOS have plans to release a build of Redhat MRG? If not, please, please consider doing it.
[V Srikanth, please always provide a descriptive Subject with your email.]
I had no trouble rebuilding all the packages from:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHEMRG/SRPMS/
So I guess that you will be able to recompile those as well, and perhaps it won't be too difficult for CentOS project to do a rebuild.
I haven't looked at any of the packages to see what trademark material there is which would need to be removed by the CentOS project.
Are there dev guidelines on how to approach the trademark issue?
--- Charlie
Charlie Brady wrote:
I had no trouble rebuilding all the packages from: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHEMRG/SRPMS/
Sounds good :)
So I guess that you will be able to recompile those as well, and perhaps it won't be too difficult for CentOS project to do a rebuild.
How sure are we that things also compare well with pkgs from upstream ?
I haven't looked at any of the packages to see what trademark material there is which would need to be removed by the CentOS project.
I guess we can have a look for those as well. There are no real guidelines at this time, that might be something else worth considering.
- KB
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Charlie Brady wrote:
I had no trouble rebuilding all the packages from: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHEMRG/SRPMS/
Sounds good :)
So I guess that you will be able to recompile those as well, and perhaps it won't be too difficult for CentOS project to do a rebuild.
How sure are we that things also compare well with pkgs from upstream ?
Me? Not at all. Most packages are .noarch, so I doubt there are any subtle differences re upstream.
Is there a published protocol for doing binary comparisons with upstream?
I haven't looked at any of the packages to see what trademark material there is which would need to be removed by the CentOS project.
I guess we can have a look for those as well. There are no real guidelines at this time, that might be something else worth considering.
Thanks.