Hi,
I just got off a half hour discussion with the pulp guys for the CentOS Container Pipeline registry story.
1. docker save x.tar produces a v1 tarball and not a v2 tarball 2. This tarball doesnt contain metadata such as tags and so on. 3. docker pull from docker 1.6 assumes the registry being pulled from is a v2 registry 4. v1 registry has been depricated. 5. Currently, the only way to get a v2 repo into pulp or any other registry is to first push it to docker registry and then sync our registry to it.
I seriously am beginning to hate docker.
On 01/03/16 16:04, Mohammed Zeeshan wrote:
we already do this, since the builder uses its own local registry
what does 'sync to our registry' involve ?
Hi
We need to push to a docker registry, either docker hub or docker private registry and then sync the pulp/crane registry with that. The syncs pulls the metadata as well allowing docker pull to work with it.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
Hey,
we already have that registry - it's part of the OpenShift, right?:) Can we sync only specific namespaces/images/tags?
Vašek
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Mohammed Zeeshan <mohammed.zee1000@gmail.com
wrote:
This is how you sync a registry
pulp-admin docker repo create --repo-id=synctest --feed=https://index.docker.io --upstream-name=busybox
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Vaclav Pavlin vpavlin@redhat.com wrote:
The options in front of us right now are
1. Go ahead with docker private registry. 2. Use both(docker registry in background or use docker hub) and use the sync method to pull stuff 3. Use docker 1.10 (apparently docker save there saves in 2.0 format) : need to verify.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Mohammed Zeeshan <mohammed.zee1000@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Vaclav Pavlin vpavlin@redhat.com wrote:
I believe busybox is the repo name here to indicate the image. we also need a way to track based on image name with tags. Once we sync based on the image with tags, we will be able to trigger build stages.
Regards Bamacharan
Hi I am working on figuring things out here. As I dig deeper, it keeps getting murkier. Hopefully, when KB and team are here, we can sort this issue out completely. In the meantime, the docker repository should be sufficient. I will continue trying to make it work/gather the facts in the meantime.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Bamacharan Kundu bamachrn@gmail.com wrote: