hi,
While working on the push to buildlogs, I noticed there is a custom docker ( 1.9 ) in the PaaS Common target, i presume the distro docker ( 1.9.1 ) isnt suitable ?
----- [root@centos7 ~]# yum list docker Available Packages docker.x86_64 1.8.2-10.el7.centos extras -----
Nope, distro docker is still at 1.8.2 We're also looking at docker 1.10 already, so I'm suspecting that we'll be ahead of the distro docker most of the time.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
hi,
While working on the push to buildlogs, I noticed there is a custom docker ( 1.9 ) in the PaaS Common target, i presume the distro docker ( 1.9.1 ) isnt suitable ?
-- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
Doing a yum clean all shows that I had old yum cache
----- [root@centos7 ~]# yum list docker Available Packages docker.x86_64 1.9.1-25.el7.centos extras -----
As I said, we'll be going to docker 1.10 probably before the base centos does. Maybe this is something to bring up in the PaaS weekly meeting tomorrow.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Troy Dawson tdawson@redhat.com wrote:
[root@centos7 ~]# yum list docker Available Packages docker.x86_64 1.8.2-10.el7.centos extras
Nope, distro docker is still at 1.8.2 We're also looking at docker 1.10 already, so I'm suspecting that we'll be ahead of the distro docker most of the time.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
hi,
While working on the push to buildlogs, I noticed there is a custom docker ( 1.9 ) in the PaaS Common target, i presume the distro docker ( 1.9.1 ) isnt suitable ?
-- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
On 05/04/16 16:29, Troy Dawson wrote:
Doing a yum clean all shows that I had old yum cache
[root@centos7 ~]# yum list docker Available Packages docker.x86_64 1.9.1-25.el7.centos extras
As I said, we'll be going to docker 1.10 probably before the base centos does. Maybe this is something to bring up in the PaaS weekly meeting tomorrow.
sounds good.
I hear there were some compat issues when moving to 1.10 ?
Also, Lokesh has been doing some docker upstream work - do we want to sync him into this ? ref: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=111 as part of the Virt SIG
Regards
-
Karanbir Singh -
Troy Dawson