Notification:
So far, the ConfigManagement SIG rebuilt and shipped some Ansible versions through different repos (per "branch") over the last months/years , so we currently still have on mirror.centos.org (and so external mirrors) the following repositories :
For CentOS 7: - ansible 2.6 - ansible 2.7 - ansible 2.8 - ansible 2.9
For CentOS 8 (also working on 8-stream) : - ansible 2.9
Per Ansible EOL policy (see https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/devel/reference_appendices/release_and_main...) we'll continue to maintain 2.8 (security fixes if they appear) and 2.9 but we'll remove previous versions/repositories.
Worth knowing that they'd still be available through vault.centos.org though, but not available directly through a centos-release-ansible*.rpm (configuring yum/dnf repositories on systems)
So far I never had a chance/time to look at ansible 2.10, as there is a split between ansible-base and ansible-core and then collections. My goal would be to discuss with EPEL/Fedora maintainer (Kevin Fenzi) about the best way to have it working and then we can start (re)building through configmanagement tags on https://cbs.centos.org
Kind Regards,
On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 01:48:17PM +0100, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
Notification:
So far, the ConfigManagement SIG rebuilt and shipped some Ansible versions through different repos (per "branch") over the last months/years , so we currently still have on mirror.centos.org (and so external mirrors) the following repositories :
For CentOS 7:
- ansible 2.6
- ansible 2.7
- ansible 2.8
- ansible 2.9
For CentOS 8 (also working on 8-stream) :
- ansible 2.9
Per Ansible EOL policy (see https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/devel/reference_appendices/release_and_main...) we'll continue to maintain 2.8 (security fixes if they appear) and 2.9 but we'll remove previous versions/repositories.
Worth knowing that they'd still be available through vault.centos.org though, but not available directly through a centos-release-ansible*.rpm (configuring yum/dnf repositories on systems)
So far I never had a chance/time to look at ansible 2.10, as there is a split between ansible-base and ansible-core and then collections. My goal would be to discuss with EPEL/Fedora maintainer (Kevin Fenzi) about the best way to have it working and then we can start (re)building through configmanagement tags on https://cbs.centos.org
Yeah, I have ansible-base + a few collections in rawhide now. But I would suggest holding off on it a bit more as from what I understand it's going to be renamed ansible-core in 2.11 and things are still in a bit of flux. (Also things like docs building needs some more things packaged and tests need a few more things).
You're welcome to look at the spec and collections rpms if you want to start testing things now.
kevin
The 2.6 version is the only one validated to install OKD 3.11.
Yes, some of us have this old version of OpenShift running in production.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021, 4:48 AM Fabian Arrotin arrfab@centos.org wrote:
Notification:
So far, the ConfigManagement SIG rebuilt and shipped some Ansible versions through different repos (per "branch") over the last months/years , so we currently still have on mirror.centos.org (and so external mirrors) the following repositories :
For CentOS 7:
- ansible 2.6
- ansible 2.7
- ansible 2.8
- ansible 2.9
For CentOS 8 (also working on 8-stream) :
- ansible 2.9
Per Ansible EOL policy (see
https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/devel/reference_appendices/release_and_main... ) we'll continue to maintain 2.8 (security fixes if they appear) and 2.9 but we'll remove previous versions/repositories.
Worth knowing that they'd still be available through vault.centos.org though, but not available directly through a centos-release-ansible*.rpm (configuring yum/dnf repositories on systems)
So far I never had a chance/time to look at ansible 2.10, as there is a split between ansible-base and ansible-core and then collections. My goal would be to discuss with EPEL/Fedora maintainer (Kevin Fenzi) about the best way to have it working and then we can start (re)building through configmanagement tags on https://cbs.centos.org
Kind Regards,
Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
As Fabian said, they will stay available in vault.centos.org.
On 02 Feb 14:04, Larry Brigman wrote:
The 2.6 version is the only one validated to install OKD 3.11.
Yes, some of us have this old version of OpenShift running in production.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021, 4:48 AM Fabian Arrotin arrfab@centos.org wrote:
Notification:
So far, the ConfigManagement SIG rebuilt and shipped some Ansible versions through different repos (per "branch") over the last months/years , so we currently still have on mirror.centos.org (and so external mirrors) the following repositories :
For CentOS 7:
- ansible 2.6
- ansible 2.7
- ansible 2.8
- ansible 2.9
For CentOS 8 (also working on 8-stream) :
- ansible 2.9
Per Ansible EOL policy (see
https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/devel/reference_appendices/release_and_main... ) we'll continue to maintain 2.8 (security fixes if they appear) and 2.9 but we'll remove previous versions/repositories.
Worth knowing that they'd still be available through vault.centos.org though, but not available directly through a centos-release-ansible*.rpm (configuring yum/dnf repositories on systems)
So far I never had a chance/time to look at ansible 2.10, as there is a split between ansible-base and ansible-core and then collections. My goal would be to discuss with EPEL/Fedora maintainer (Kevin Fenzi) about the best way to have it working and then we can start (re)building through configmanagement tags on https://cbs.centos.org
Kind Regards,
Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-
Fabian Arrotin -
Julien Pivotto -
Kevin Fenzi -
Larry Brigman