Hello,
it seems there is something wrong with the repositories after 4.8 release. some packages (pango, acpid and most notably bind, probably others too) are in much older versions in base repo then they were in updates before 4.8
Could somebody check it please?
with best regards
nik
On 08/24/2009 10:15 AM, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
it seems there is something wrong with the repositories after 4.8 release. some packages (pango, acpid and most notably bind, probably others too) are in much older versions in base repo then they were in updates before 4.8
This is not a problem, unless whats in 4.8+updates is still older than 4.7+updates. Check against that, and if you find any post including version-release for the pkgs
Hi Karanbir, well, but it is the case exactly, see bind for example: 4.8/os/i386/CentOS/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2.i386.rpm, changelog head:
* Tue Feb 10 23:00:00 2009 Adam Tkac <atkac redhat com> 20:9.2.4-30.2 - abort timeout queries to reduce the number of open UDP sockets (#476515) - handle EMFILE error from accept() gracefully (#476515) and no bind package in 4.8/updates/.../
and: centos/4.7/updates/i386/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-30.el4_8.4.i386.rpm, changelog head: * Thu Jul 30 00:00:00 2009 Tomas Hoger <thoger redhat com> 20:9.2.4-30.4 - security fix for remote DoS (CVE-2009-0696, #514292)
according to el4_8.4 in release tag I'd say that somehow 4.8 packages got to 4.7 directory...
nik.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:29:35AM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 08/24/2009 10:15 AM, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
it seems there is something wrong with the repositories after 4.8 release. some packages (pango, acpid and most notably bind, probably others too) are in much older versions in base repo then they were in updates before 4.8
This is not a problem, unless whats in 4.8+updates is still older than 4.7+updates. Check against that, and if you find any post including version-release for the pkgs
-- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
On 08/24/2009 02:13 PM, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
4.8/os/i386/CentOS/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2.i386.rpm, changelog head: centos/4.7/updates/i386/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-30.el4_8.4.i386.rpm, changelog head:
and 4.8/updates ?
it's not there.. n. On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 02:32:07PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 08/24/2009 02:13 PM, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
4.8/os/i386/CentOS/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2.i386.rpm, changelog head: centos/4.7/updates/i386/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-30.el4_8.4.i386.rpm, changelog head:
and 4.8/updates ?
-- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
On 08/24/2009 02:39 PM, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
it's not there.. n. On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 02:32:07PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 08/24/2009 02:13 PM, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
4.8/os/i386/CentOS/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2.i386.rpm, changelog head: centos/4.7/updates/i386/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-30.el4_8.4.i386.rpm, changelog head:
and 4.8/updates ?
try not top posting... also, with this info - you should now be good to open an issue report at http://bugs.centos.org/
Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hello,
it seems there is something wrong with the repositories after 4.8 release. some packages (pango, acpid and most notably bind, probably others too) are in much older versions in base repo then they were in updates before 4.8
Could somebody check it please?
with best regards
nik
Pango is pango-1.6.0-9.i386.rpm on the RHEL 4.8 ISO
acpid is acpid-1.0.3-2.i386.rpm on the RHEL 4.8 ISO
bind is bind-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2.i386.rpm is on the RHEL 4.8 ISO
all of those are the same in our base repo and on our ISO. We duplicate their release in this, as that is our goal. (The things in the base repo are what is on the ISO).
I will double check all updates are pushed into updates if there are some that were released by RH before 4.8 was released, but did not make it onto their ISO.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
OK, seems like bind-9.2.4-30.el4_8.4 got into the 4.8 updates in the meantime, so the problem is certainly solved. have a nice day n.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:33:07PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hello,
it seems there is something wrong with the repositories after 4.8 release. some packages (pango, acpid and most notably bind, probably others too) are in much older versions in base repo then they were in updates before 4.8
Could somebody check it please?
with best regards
nik
Pango is pango-1.6.0-9.i386.rpm on the RHEL 4.8 ISO
acpid is acpid-1.0.3-2.i386.rpm on the RHEL 4.8 ISO
bind is bind-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2.i386.rpm is on the RHEL 4.8 ISO
all of those are the same in our base repo and on our ISO. We duplicate their release in this, as that is our goal. (The things in the base repo are what is on the ISO).
I will double check all updates are pushed into updates if there are some that were released by RH before 4.8 was released, but did not make it onto their ISO.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
Nikola Ciprich wrote:
OK, seems like bind-9.2.4-30.el4_8.4 got into the 4.8 updates in the meantime, so the problem is certainly solved. have a nice day n.
Yes, all 3 of the RPMS you mentioned, as well as ntp and evolution28-pango had updates released before 4.8 upstream, but did not make onto the 4.8 ISO/Tree ... they have been moved into updates.
Thanks for the initial report.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:33:07PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hello,
it seems there is something wrong with the repositories after 4.8 release. some packages (pango, acpid and most notably bind, probably others too) are in much older versions in base repo then they were in updates before 4.8
Could somebody check it please?
with best regards
nik
Pango is pango-1.6.0-9.i386.rpm on the RHEL 4.8 ISO
acpid is acpid-1.0.3-2.i386.rpm on the RHEL 4.8 ISO
bind is bind-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2.i386.rpm is on the RHEL 4.8 ISO
all of those are the same in our base repo and on our ISO. We duplicate their release in this, as that is our goal. (The things in the base repo are what is on the ISO).
I will double check all updates are pushed into updates if there are some that were released by RH before 4.8 was released, but did not make it onto their ISO.
-
Johnny Hughes -
Karanbir Singh -
Nikola Ciprich