Hello Everyone,
Did anyone pick this up to port the upstream RHGS to CentOS? If not what would it take to start this process? I have an interest in doing this if not.
Roy
On 2016-09-14 23:48, Roy Williams wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Did anyone pick this up to port the upstream RHGS to CentOS? If not what would it take to start this process? I have an interest in doing this if not.
Roy
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
Hi,
if you mean the GlusterFS packages and oVirt console, they are already available for CentOS.
//Zdenek
Zdenek,
I did understand oVirt is essentially stripped down in RHGS, but I didn't know if there was interest in porting that stripped down oVirt?
Roy
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Zdenek Sedlak dev@apgrco.com wrote:
On 2016-09-14 23:48, Roy Williams wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Did anyone pick this up to port the upstream RHGS to CentOS? If not what would it take to start this process? I have an interest in doing this if not.
Roy
CentOS-devel mailing listCentOS-devel@centos.orghttps://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
Hi,
if you mean the GlusterFS packages and oVirt console, they are already available for CentOS.
//Zdenek
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Roy Williams fang64@gmail.com wrote:
Zdenek,
I did understand oVirt is essentially stripped down in RHGS, but I didn't know if there was interest in porting that stripped down oVirt?
We're working in porting oVirt in CentOS Virt SIG but even RHGS being based on oVirt will suffer of the maven dependencies packaging hell. You're welcome to contribute helping with oVirt packaging if you've interest in it.
Roy
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Zdenek Sedlak dev@apgrco.com wrote:
On 2016-09-14 23:48, Roy Williams wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Did anyone pick this up to port the upstream RHGS to CentOS? If not what would it take to start this process? I have an interest in doing this if not.
Roy
CentOS-devel mailing listCentOS-devel@centos.orghttps://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
Hi,
if you mean the GlusterFS packages and oVirt console, they are already available for CentOS.
//Zdenek
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
--
Roy Williams
IT Consultant | Programmer
http://www.fang64.com
_/| ____ =/_/ ,;` `;, _/ | : :
( / , | :, ,; \ _ /^ \ /| | `------ ` `'' '' `''`
"The brick walls are there for a reason. Right? The brick walls are not there to keep us out, the brick walls are there to give us a chance to show how badly we want something. Because the brick walls are there to stop the people who don't want it badly enough." -Randy Pausch, CMU (RIP July 25, 2008)
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
Sandro,
I would definitely be interested in helping with the oVirt CentOS Virt SIG, I am a little tied up today with a meeting.
Roy
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Sandro Bonazzola sbonazzo@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Roy Williams fang64@gmail.com wrote:
Zdenek,
I did understand oVirt is essentially stripped down in RHGS, but I didn't know if there was interest in porting that stripped down oVirt?
We're working in porting oVirt in CentOS Virt SIG but even RHGS being based on oVirt will suffer of the maven dependencies packaging hell. You're welcome to contribute helping with oVirt packaging if you've interest in it.
Roy
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Zdenek Sedlak dev@apgrco.com wrote:
On 2016-09-14 23:48, Roy Williams wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Did anyone pick this up to port the upstream RHGS to CentOS? If not what would it take to start this process? I have an interest in doing this if not.
Roy
CentOS-devel mailing listCentOS-devel@centos.orghttps://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
Hi,
if you mean the GlusterFS packages and oVirt console, they are already available for CentOS.
//Zdenek
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
--
Roy Williams
IT Consultant | Programmer
http://www.fang64.com
_/| ____ =/_/ ,;` `;, _/ | : :
( / , | :, ,; \ _ /^ \ /| | `------ ` `'' '' `''`
"The brick walls are there for a reason. Right? The brick walls are not there to keep us out, the brick walls are there to give us a chance to show how badly we want something. Because the brick walls are there to stop the people who don't want it badly enough." -Randy Pausch, CMU (RIP July 25, 2008)
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/it/about/events/red-hat-open-source-day-2016
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
[Note: RHGS stands for Red Hat Gluster Storage]
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 05:48:07PM -0400, Roy Williams wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Did anyone pick this up to port the upstream RHGS to CentOS? If not what would it take to start this process? I have an interest in doing this if not.
Hi Roy,
The CentOS Storage SIG already provides different Gluster Community versions and includes a few additional tools. Some of the details are on the CentOS Wiki: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/gluster-Quickstart
If you are aware of this already, I'd like to know your reasons why this does not address your needs.
It is possible to start new repositories provided by the Storage SIG that contain rebuilds (and trademark stripping?) of RHGS packages. There have not been any good reasons to do so yet though. If you are willing to get this done, we can work together on setting it up and all. But not that is will cost you quite some time to follow updates, rebuild, test and get them published.
Thanks, Niels