Hello,
Sorry for bothering you, I just joined your list. But when I was using different RHEL clone (SL), I found out that package pcs is not rebranded. So whey you log into High Availability console (one operating on 2224 and https) you have Red Hat logo.
Source1: HAM-logo.png in rpm is responsible for that. There is also favicon in source pcs-0.9.143/pcsd/public/favicon.ico which is Red Hat :). Moreover there is pcs-0.9.143/pcsd/public/css/overpass_bold-web.svg which is font owned (???) by Red Hat :(. I don't know if it's important.
The source of every generated page has also commented Red Hat footer. It's probably also not a big deal.
Bests, Alex Baranowski
On 22 Aug 22:56, aleksander.baranowski wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for bothering you, I just joined your list. But when I was using different RHEL clone (SL), I found out that package pcs is not rebranded. So whey you log into High Availability console (one operating on 2224 and https) you have Red Hat logo.
Source1: HAM-logo.png in rpm is responsible for that. There is also favicon in source pcs-0.9.143/pcsd/public/favicon.ico which is Red Hat :). Moreover there is pcs-0.9.143/pcsd/public/css/overpass_bold-web.svg which is font owned (???) by Red Hat :(. I don't know if it's important.
The source of every generated page has also commented Red Hat footer. It's probably also not a big deal.
Bests, Alex Baranowski
I opened this bug report in september, including centos-branded logo. Please add your observations to this ticket.
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9426
best regards,
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-
aleksander.baranowski -
Julien Pivotto