Hello,
quite a while ago, I asked for creation of the messaging SIG.
There is even a wiki page for this[1], and it was created over half a year ago, the initial discussion has even been older.
However, this wasn't resolved (yet). I also have to realise, I couldn't put the deserved energy and time to this proposal. Nevertheless, I still think the idea is good and would help other SIGs with their use of messaging related packages and setups.
So with that, can we please go back to start and get this finished? Maybe it would be benificial, if someone else from the Centos Board could jump in and help KB with this?
Thank you, Matthias
[1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Messaging
Hi Matthias,
pretty sure we closed this off - you should be ok to go ahead and ask for the tag's etc ( my bad, i thought I'd already cleared this with you a few months ago ).
Let me go back and recap all the details
On 01/03/2019 11:02, Matthias Runge wrote:
Hello,
quite a while ago, I asked for creation of the messaging SIG.
There is even a wiki page for this[1], and it was created over half a year ago, the initial discussion has even been older.
However, this wasn't resolved (yet). I also have to realise, I couldn't put the deserved energy and time to this proposal. Nevertheless, I still think the idea is good and would help other SIGs with their use of messaging related packages and setups.
So with that, can we please go back to start and get this finished? Maybe it would be benificial, if someone else from the Centos Board could jump in and help KB with this?
Thank you, Matthias
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 12:41:51AM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi Matthias,
pretty sure we closed this off - you should be ok to go ahead and ask for the tag's etc ( my bad, i thought I'd already cleared this with you a few months ago ).
Let me go back and recap all the details
KB,
did this happen and what was the outcome?
Matthias
On 01/03/2019 11:02, Matthias Runge wrote:
Hello,
quite a while ago, I asked for creation of the messaging SIG.
There is even a wiki page for this[1], and it was created over half a year ago, the initial discussion has even been older.
However, this wasn't resolved (yet). I also have to realise, I couldn't put the deserved energy and time to this proposal. Nevertheless, I still think the idea is good and would help other SIGs with their use of messaging related packages and setups.
So with that, can we please go back to start and get this finished? Maybe it would be benificial, if someone else from the Centos Board could jump in and help KB with this?
Thank you, Matthias
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
On 06/03/2019 12:55, Matthias Runge wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 12:41:51AM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi Matthias,
pretty sure we closed this off - you should be ok to go ahead and ask for the tag's etc ( my bad, i thought I'd already cleared this with you a few months ago ).
Let me go back and recap all the details
KB,
did this happen and what was the outcome?
Lazy consensus, you are good to go ahead and create Tag's etc for the SIG and move to onboarded status.
thanks!
On 3/6/19 9:43 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 06/03/2019 12:55, Matthias Runge wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 12:41:51AM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi Matthias,
pretty sure we closed this off - you should be ok to go ahead and ask for the tag's etc ( my bad, i thought I'd already cleared this with you a few months ago ).
Let me go back and recap all the details
KB,
did this happen and what was the outcome?
Lazy consensus, you are good to go ahead and create Tag's etc for the SIG and move to onboarded status.
Excellent.
Matthias, can we do a blog post to relaunch this effort - explain what the purpose of the SIG is, what its output will be, who you need to get involved, and so on?
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 10:26:08AM -0500, Rich Bowen wrote:
On 3/6/19 9:43 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 06/03/2019 12:55, Matthias Runge wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 12:41:51AM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi Matthias,
pretty sure we closed this off - you should be ok to go ahead and ask for the tag's etc ( my bad, i thought I'd already cleared this with you a few months ago ).
Let me go back and recap all the details
KB,
did this happen and what was the outcome?
Lazy consensus, you are good to go ahead and create Tag's etc for the SIG and move to onboarded status.
Excellent.
Matthias, can we do a blog post to relaunch this effort - explain what the purpose of the SIG is, what its output will be, who you need to get involved, and so on?
Yes, indeed, this is great news.
We (I?) should put together a blog post and get this going.
Matthias
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 02:43:20PM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 06/03/2019 12:55, Matthias Runge wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 12:41:51AM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi Matthias,
pretty sure we closed this off - you should be ok to go ahead and ask for the tag's etc ( my bad, i thought I'd already cleared this with you a few months ago ).
Let me go back and recap all the details
KB,
did this happen and what was the outcome?
Lazy consensus, you are good to go ahead and create Tag's etc for the SIG and move to onboarded status.
thanks!
Thanks a ton, will do!
Matthias
-
Karanbir Singh -
Matthias Runge -
Rich Bowen