WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 17:00 Brno, 11:00 Boston, 1:00+1d Tokyo, 2:00+1d Brisbane) in #centos-devel on Freenode.
= Topics = * current status * prefix for packages in upstream and downstream SCLs
Short wrap-up: * scl packages get build as scratch build already * but there is a problem in centpkg and centos koji with fedora-like layout and these tools only support centos layout (spec files in SPECS, sources in SOURCES dir) * hhorak will see how big problem this is regarding the cherry-picking and merging, since it is an important requirement for rhscl maintainers to user centos as upstream * it is not problem to keep any structure in upstream repos, but how to build such packages is not very clear
* prefixes conversation -- very long one * using rh- prefix should solve: 1) separate rh driven/shipped scls from other communities 2) not cause huge pain on people writing dependent collections 3) not stomping on existing (non-scl) package names * then there was a long discussion about where the prefix should be used -- whether in the name of the collection or in the dist tag ... many thought given, but no consensus reached so far, so the conversation will continue somehow, somewhere
Honza
On 12/16/2014 07:18 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 17:00 Brno, 11:00 Boston, 1:00+1d Tokyo, 2:00+1d Brisbane) in #centos-devel on Freenode.
= Topics =
- current status
- prefix for packages in upstream and downstream SCLs
SCLorg mailing list SCLorg@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
If anybody was interested in the full log, see the attached file.
Honza
On 12/17/2014 07:49 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
Short wrap-up:
- scl packages get build as scratch build already
- but there is a problem in centpkg and centos koji with fedora-like
layout and these tools only support centos layout (spec files in SPECS, sources in SOURCES dir)
- hhorak will see how big problem this is regarding the cherry-picking
and merging, since it is an important requirement for rhscl maintainers to user centos as upstream
- it is not problem to keep any structure in upstream repos, but how
to build such packages is not very clear
- prefixes conversation -- very long one
- using rh- prefix should solve:
- separate rh driven/shipped scls from other communities
- not cause huge pain on people writing dependent collections
- not stomping on existing (non-scl) package names
- then there was a long discussion about where the prefix should be
used -- whether in the name of the collection or in the dist tag ... many thought given, but no consensus reached so far, so the conversation will continue somehow, somewhere
Honza
On 12/16/2014 07:18 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 17:00 Brno, 11:00 Boston, 1:00+1d Tokyo, 2:00+1d Brisbane) in #centos-devel on Freenode.
= Topics =
- current status
- prefix for packages in upstream and downstream SCLs
SCLorg mailing list SCLorg@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
SCLorg mailing list SCLorg@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
On 12/17/2014 10:50 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
If anybody was interested in the full log, see the attached file.
Are you using centbot for logging the meeting? How to here:
http://libflow.com/d/qqzcb216/IRC-MEETBOT_Syntax_Cheat_Sheet https://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
Here is an example of an aggregation page:
http://www.centos.org/minutes/2014/december/centos-devel.2014-12-15-14.04.ht...
On that type of main page are links to the full logs, directly and with anchors:
http://www.centos.org/minutes/2014/december/centos-devel.2014-12-15-14.04.lo...
Looking here you can see the main page and log in plain text too:
http://www.centos.org/minutes/2014/december/
Cheers,
- Karsten
Hi Honza,
Just wanted to apologise for missing this today, had to attend irl meetings at work. I do intend to come along in future.
Thanks!
Jon
Sent from my iPad
On 17 Dec 2014, at 18:49, Honza Horak hhorak@redhat.com wrote:
Short wrap-up:
scl packages get build as scratch build already
but there is a problem in centpkg and centos koji with fedora-like layout and these tools only support centos layout (spec files in SPECS, sources in SOURCES dir)
hhorak will see how big problem this is regarding the cherry-picking and merging, since it is an important requirement for rhscl maintainers to user centos as upstream
it is not problem to keep any structure in upstream repos, but how to build such packages is not very clear
prefixes conversation -- very long one
using rh- prefix should solve:
- separate rh driven/shipped scls from other communities
- not cause huge pain on people writing dependent collections
- not stomping on existing (non-scl) package names
then there was a long discussion about where the prefix should be used -- whether in the name of the collection or in the dist tag ... many thought given, but no consensus reached so far, so the conversation will continue somehow, somewhere
Honza
On 12/16/2014 07:18 PM, Honza Horak wrote: WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 17:00 Brno, 11:00 Boston, 1:00+1d Tokyo, 2:00+1d Brisbane) in #centos-devel on Freenode.
= Topics =
- current status
- prefix for packages in upstream and downstream SCLs
SCLorg mailing list SCLorg@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-
Honza Horak -
Jonathan Ludlam -
Karsten Wade