I've switched my CentOS Linux 8 workstation to CentOS Stream 8 quite some time ago, and haven't encountered too many issues doing so, but I'm curious as to why there haven't been any package updates that I can see in quite some time (since early October as far as I can see).
With the new stream process, my understanding is that for feature and bugfix development, the process is:
Git ---> CentOS Stream ---> RHEL (next minor version)
But with security updates, it seems to be:
Git ---> RHEL (current minor version) ---> RHEL rebuilds (Rocky, Alma, etc)
I'm kind of surprised that my firefox and thunderbird builds still seem stuck at 91.13.0, when I've seen updates go by on the RHEL 8 channels with the newer firefox builds, etc.
What is the flow for security updates to make it into CentOS Stream package repositories? Is there some documentation describing this that maybe I missed? I don't remember seeing this on the CPE newsletter either.
Thanks, Greg
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022, at 10:13, Greg Bailey wrote:
I've switched my CentOS Linux 8 workstation to CentOS Stream 8 quite some time ago, and haven't encountered too many issues doing so, but I'm curious as to why there haven't been any package updates that I can see in quite some time (since early October as far as I can see).
With the new stream process, my understanding is that for feature and bugfix development, the process is:
Git ---> CentOS Stream ---> RHEL (next minor version)
This is how things work for CentOS Stream 9. Code goes to https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/ first (though Important and Critical CVE fixes go to RHEL before being published)
But with security updates, it seems to be:
Git ---> RHEL (current minor version) ---> RHEL rebuilds (Rocky, Alma, etc)
I'm kind of surprised that my firefox and thunderbird builds still seem stuck at 91.13.0, when I've seen updates go by on the RHEL 8 channels with the newer firefox builds, etc.
What is the flow for security updates to make it into CentOS Stream package repositories? Is there some documentation describing this that maybe I missed? I don't remember seeing this on the CPE newsletter either.
CentOS Stream 8 is still accomplished "inside-out", though. This means code is pushed from a RHEL nightly build and then rebuilt for release in CentOS Stream 8. We're working on transitioning Stream 8 to the "proper" workflow that 9 uses.
In this particular case, I see that Firefox 102 made it into the 27-Oct compose: https://composes.centos.org/CentOS-Stream-8-20221027.n.0/
We'll be looking into why this isn't showing up on the mirrors.
Thanks, Greg
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
--Brian
Am 04.11.22 um 17:16 schrieb Brian Stinson:
... CentOS Stream 8 is still accomplished "inside-out", though. This means code is pushed from a RHEL nightly build and then rebuilt for release in CentOS Stream 8. We're working on transitioning Stream 8 to the "proper" workflow that 9 uses.
In this particular case, I see that Firefox 102 made it into the 27-Oct compose: https://composes.centos.org/CentOS-Stream-8-20221027.n.0/
We'll be looking into why this isn't showing up on the mirrors.
It seems that the push has a missed signed repomd.xml file (or the mirrors a still syncing, but normally the content of a repodata directory would coherently mirrored, mmh?)
@Johnny, are the playbooks playing well?
Recurrent:
https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/550
-- Thanks Leon
Still working this through. The content itself is on its way out to the mirror network.
On Sat, Nov 5, 2022, at 15:19, Leon Fauster via CentOS-devel wrote:
Am 04.11.22 um 17:16 schrieb Brian Stinson:
... CentOS Stream 8 is still accomplished "inside-out", though. This means code is pushed from a RHEL nightly build and then rebuilt for release in CentOS Stream 8. We're working on transitioning Stream 8 to the "proper" workflow that 9 uses.
In this particular case, I see that Firefox 102 made it into the 27-Oct compose: https://composes.centos.org/CentOS-Stream-8-20221027.n.0/
We'll be looking into why this isn't showing up on the mirrors.
It seems that the push has a missed signed repomd.xml file (or the mirrors a still syncing, but normally the content of a repodata directory would coherently mirrored, mmh?)
@Johnny, are the playbooks playing well?
Recurrent:
https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/550
-- Thanks Leon _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel