On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 9:17 AM Ken Dreyer kdreyer@redhat.com wrote:

On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 5:54 AM Niels de Vos ndevos@redhat.com wrote:

...

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:02:48AM -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:

...

Hi Niels,

I'm looking to create a new "centos-release-ceph-nautilus" package, like the "luminous" one we have today at https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/centos-release-ceph-luminous

I'm wondering if it would be easier to keep all of these in a single "centos-release-ceph" repository, with per-release branches.

Would you be up for creating a https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/centos-release-ceph repo?

Sure, whatever the preference is for the people that package the bits!

Ken, I have invited you to the CentOS-Storage-SIG organization on GitHub (we'll move to Pagure based dist-git later). The Ceph team includes you and as full admin permissions on https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/centos-release-ceph now.

Fantastic, thank you Niels!

Following up here, https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/centos-release-ceph has a "master" branch that is unused, and the README points at the release branches.

"nautilus" is the first release branch here, and I've built the SRPM at http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24708

I've tagged the latest builds from luminous into nautilus as well.

I'm keeping track of my steps at https://github.com/ktdreyer/storage-sig-utils/blob/master/new-major-release.... so it's repeatable for each new major Ceph release. Maybe we can move that content into the CentOS wiki storage SIG space instead.

- Ken

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 1:21 AM Marcin Juszkiewicz marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org wrote:

W dniu 30.11.2018 o 18:02, Ken Dreyer pisze:

...

Hi Niels,

I'm looking to create a new "centos-release-ceph-nautilus" package, like the "luminous" one we have today at https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/centos-release-ceph-luminous

Which gcc are you using to build Ceph? SCL7?

Great question!

Upstream (ceph.com) uses SCL 7, see http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/dev/cxx/

The storage7-ceph-mimic-el7-build tag in CBS is configured to inherit from sclo7-devtoolset-7-rh-candidate. I forgot to request this at https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15269 , so I've opened a new ticket to configure that: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15514

(By the way I'm working on a new project, https://github.com/ktdreyer/koji-ansible , which should make this type of Koji configuration easier to track)

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 12:41 PM Marcin Juszkiewicz marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org wrote:

Asked because since Mimic gcc7+ is required to build Ceph. That's because of c++14 stuff which is not fully implemented in older versions.

That's also a reason why I can not build anything past Luminous under Debian 'stretch' (gcc 6.3).

Yes, is there anything like Ubuntu's PPA for Debian?

I would like to eventually distribute Ceph Nautilus through https://launchpad.net/~ceph , but it looks like I cannot build for eg. Buster there.

- Ken

On 03/12/18 20:40, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:

Asked because since Mimic gcc7+ is required to build Ceph. That's because of c++14 stuff which is not fully implemented in older versions.

That's also a reason why I can not build anything past Luminous under Debian 'stretch' (gcc 6.3).

Does Ceph require gcc to build? Debian Stretch has clang-3.8 in its repos, and even clang-6.0 in the backports (clang should have complete C++14 support in version 3.4 or newer).

Hello,

Could anybody that is be-wandered in CBS see if we could promote the Mimic candicate to testing/release [1].

I'll sit down some weekend and learn the stuff so I hopefully can help in the future since it seems like it lags behind some on the Luminous and Mimic versions.

Best regards

[1] https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=22939

On 12/04/2018 11:18 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:

W dniu 04.12.2018 o 01:47, Laurentiu Pancescu pisze:

...

On 03/12/18 20:40, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:

...

Asked because since Mimic gcc7+ is required to build Ceph. That's because of c++14 stuff which is not fully implemented in older versions.

That's also a reason why I can not build anything past Luminous under Debian 'stretch' (gcc 6.3).

Does Ceph require gcc to build?  Debian Stretch has clang-3.8 in its repos, and even clang-6.0 in the backports (clang should have complete C++14 support in version 3.4 or newer).

Let's try ;D

Thanks for suggestion. _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

W dniu 04.12.2018 o 01:47, Laurentiu Pancescu pisze:

On 03/12/18 20:40, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:

...

Asked because since Mimic gcc7+ is required to build Ceph. That's because of c++14 stuff which is not fully implemented in older versions.

That's also a reason why I can not build anything past Luminous under Debian 'stretch' (gcc 6.3).

Does Ceph require gcc to build?  Debian Stretch has clang-3.8 in its repos, and even clang-6.0 in the backports (clang should have complete C++14 support in version 3.4 or newer).

I was wrong - c++17 is required. Especially 'string_view' stuff which is heavily used since Mimic.

Clang 6.0 was not enough ;(