Glad to, pass my info along

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:

Joe Royall wrote:

...

Red Hat recentely released thier IPA server as open source. Is Centos considering a rebuild?

Tim has been planning on having a go once 5.2 is done and released, but I am sure he can use a hand, Would you be interested in helping out ?

-- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 19:11 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:

Joe Royall wrote:

...

Glad to, pass my info along

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@karan.org mailto:mail-lists@karan.org> wrote:

Joe Royall wrote:

    Red Hat recentely released thier IPA server as open source.  Is
    Centos considering a rebuild?



Tim has been planning on having a go once 5.2 is done and released,
but I am sure he can use a hand, Would you be interested in helping
out ?

Well volunteered!

I can help too, I have the client built and working. The directory server packages are needed, and also python-kerberos.

And Tim is on this list :D

ciao andrea

On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 20:31 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:

Andrea Dell'Amico wrote:

...

I can help too, I have the client built and working. The directory server packages are needed, and also python-kerberos.

For the directory server:

http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/DirectoryServerSetup

I used that for the build phase, indeed.

Feedback on that would be great also.

I'll try to set up a server environment and I'll report about it. For now I'm using Fedora 9 as IPA (ldap, kerberos) server.

Cheers,

Ralph

ciao andrea

Hi all,

I was parsing the archives yesterday and I found this old topic.

CentOS 5.3 is now released and there is still no CDS validated packages.

So my question is, should we find soon CDS packages in the Extras/CentOSplus trees or should I better maintain my own FDS packages in our own Sirisplus tree.

Jean-Marc Liger Sorbonne University Networks

Tim Verhoeven a écrit :

Just to let everyone known where I'm at right now. The CDS (CentOS Directory Server) packages are basically ready. We only have some wording issues to resolve before able to release them to the public (a.k.a. move them to the normal Extras/CentOSPlus trees).

During LinuxTag I've been able to build and compile the IPA packages on CentOS. I haven't gotten to testing them yet.

I'll get to both these things when 5.2 is released. So a little patience :-)

Regards, Tim

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:

Jean-Marc LIGER wrote:

...

CentOS 5.3 is now released and there is still no CDS validated packages.

Tim can probabally answer this question better, but iirc there was talk of rebuilding and retesting using the openjdk now included in 5.3 rather than the back ported openjdk that was used earlier.

...

So my question is, should we find soon CDS packages in the Extras/CentOSplus trees or should I better maintain my own FDS packages in our own Sirisplus tree.

If you are happy to help with the building / testing of the packages, why not do it within the CentOS setup and share with everyone else :) The exact mechanics on how this might be setup and run is something that we can look at.

Tim ?

I'm going to create the final build of CDS in the coming days. The current plan is to have these ready for a general release somewhere in the next week. So it is really soon know :-)

Regards, Tim

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Jean-Marc LIGER jean-marc.liger@siris.sorbonne.fr wrote:

One of the jobs I'm paid for is to maintain Upstream/CentOS packages for our servers. I've already built Fedora DS 1.2.0 packages for that purpose (latest version, nothing to deal with branding) that we use as a Replica.

But I'd rather use CentOS built quality process packages, and for that reason and more, your post sounds good for me ;-)

Anyway, my help is offered if you need so.

You can probably help out in testing these final rebuilds for we release them to the general public. So if you have some time next week ?

Regards, Tim

Hi all,

Since CDS is released today. Exist some roadmap to publish IPA for CentOS 5.x??

Thanks.

Jean-Marc LIGER wrote:

Hi all,

I was parsing the archives yesterday and I found this old topic.

CentOS 5.3 is now released and there is still no CDS validated packages.

So my question is, should we find soon CDS packages in the Extras/CentOSplus trees or should I better maintain my own FDS packages in our own Sirisplus tree.

Jean-Marc Liger Sorbonne University Networks

Tim Verhoeven a écrit :

...

Just to let everyone known where I'm at right now. The CDS (CentOS Directory Server) packages are basically ready. We only have some wording issues to resolve before able to release them to the public (a.k.a. move them to the normal Extras/CentOSPlus trees).

During LinuxTag I've been able to build and compile the IPA packages on CentOS. I haven't gotten to testing them yet.

I'll get to both these things when 5.2 is released. So a little patience :-)

Regards, Tim

---

CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

On 27/05/09 19:22, carlopmart wrote:

Hi all,

Since CDS is released today. Exist some roadmap to publish IPA for CentOS 5.x??

there was an involved conversation about IPA a few months back, and since there is little interest to keep it going in its present form either upstream or downstream, most people were not all that keen.

If you are so inclined, why not put in some legwork and work out what the situation is and what could / should / might be done. Anything you need from 'this' end of the spectrum, feel free to ask here on the list.

- KB