Re: [CentOS-devel] [CentOS-announce] Announcing release for MySQL 5.5 and 5.6 on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64 SCL
Hi Honza,
Am 21.12.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Honza Horak hhorak@redhat.com:
I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of versions 5.5 and 5.6 of the MySQL on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo).
QuickStart
You can get started in three easy steps (example of MySQL 5.6): $ sudo yum install centos-release-scl $ sudo yum install rh-mysql56 $ scl enable rh-mysql56 bash
should centos-release-scl not have at least a "Obsoletes: centos-release-SCL" statement?
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos-release-SCL-... vs http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos-release-scl-...
-- LF
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Leon Fauster leonfauster@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Honza,
Am 21.12.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Honza Horak hhorak@redhat.com:
I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of versions 5.5 and 5.6 of the MySQL on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo).
QuickStart
You can get started in three easy steps (example of MySQL 5.6): $ sudo yum install centos-release-scl $ sudo yum install rh-mysql56 $ scl enable rh-mysql56 bash
should centos-release-scl not have at least a "Obsoletes: centos-release-SCL" statement?
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos-release-SCL-... vs http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos-release-scl-...
And a "Provides: centos-release-SCL", for people like me with "mock" configurations that used it.
On 12/01/16 03:51, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
should centos-release-scl not have at least a "Obsoletes: centos-release-SCL" statement?
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos-release-SCL-... vs http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos-release-scl-...
And a "Provides: centos-release-SCL", for people like me with "mock" configurations that used it.
honza can shed a bit more light on this, but it was discussed before the first SCL release - and it appeared to not be needed, as new users would just migrate over.
regards,
On 01/12/2016 11:58 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 12/01/16 03:51, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
should centos-release-scl not have at least a "Obsoletes: centos-release-SCL" statement?
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos-release-SCL-... vs http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos-release-scl-...
And a "Provides: centos-release-SCL", for people like me with "mock" configurations that used it.
honza can shed a bit more light on this, but it was discussed before the first SCL release - and it appeared to not be needed, as new users would just migrate over.
We discussed this topic, but haven't closed it IIRC. New users won't need it, correct. But I remember we said the old users would probably expect centos-release-SCL will be replaced by centos-release-scl automatically. So, it still seems something we should change.
This couldn't be done before the first release, because all the collections weren't released at that point. Now, I believe we can add the Provides/Obsoletes bits into centos-release-SCL. Let's discuss this on the meeting tomorrow.
Honza
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Honza Horak hhorak@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/12/2016 11:58 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
We discussed this topic, but haven't closed it IIRC. New users won't need it, correct. But I remember we said the old users would probably expect centos-release-SCL will be replaced by centos-release-scl automatically. So, it still seems something we should change.
This couldn't be done before the first release, because all the collections weren't released at that point. Now, I believe we can add the Provides/Obsoletes bits into centos-release-SCL. Let's discuss this on the meeting tomorrow.
Honza
Please, yes, do provide "Obsoletes:" as well as "Provides:". I've got "mock" configurations in github repositories that other people use, and they may not update their configs for some time.
-
Honza Horak -
Karanbir Singh -
Leon Fauster -
Nico Kadel-Garcia