Just wondering, is there a specific reason why CentOS RPMs released don't always match the upstream RPM name?
E.g. http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2008-April/014854.html
CentOS RPM name: virt-manager-0.4.0-3.el5.1.src.rpm RedHat RPM name: virt-manager-0.4.0-3.el5_1.1.src.rpm
The binary RPMs for each arch differ in name similarly. Is this just a bug, or a specific case where this is expected?
Kevan Benson wrote:
Just wondering, is there a specific reason why CentOS RPMs released don't always match the upstream RPM name?
E.g. http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2008-April/014854.html
CentOS RPM name: virt-manager-0.4.0-3.el5.1.src.rpm RedHat RPM name: virt-manager-0.4.0-3.el5_1.1.src.rpm
The binary RPMs for each arch differ in name similarly. Is this just a bug, or a specific case where this is expected?
In this case, my mistake. Thanks for pointing it out, I'll get that fixed shortly
-
Karanbir Singh -
Kevan Benson