hi,
All the GSoC stuff going through should map to a SIG ( or in some cases multiple ones ) - it would be great to see the GSoC students come along and interface with the SIG's, and maybe do updates on progress at the SIG Meetings.
- KB
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:57:07AM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
All the GSoC stuff going through should map to a SIG ( or in some cases multiple ones ) - it would be great to see the GSoC students come along and interface with the SIG's, and maybe do updates on progress at the SIG Meetings.
Hi,
This sounds like a great idea. My project (kernel livepatching) seems to fall somewhere under the new hardening SIG, but that is still in the process of being set up. Is delivering kernel patch modules within the scope of this SIG?
Cheers, Louis
On Apr 29, 2015, at 4:12 AM, Louis Taylor louis@kragniz.eu wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:57:07AM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: All the GSoC stuff going through should map to a SIG ( or in some cases multiple ones ) - it would be great to see the GSoC students come along and interface with the SIG's, and maybe do updates on progress at the SIG Meetings.
Hi,
This sounds like a great idea. My project (kernel livepatching) seems to fall somewhere under the new hardening SIG, but that is still in the process of being set up. Is delivering kernel patch modules within the scope of this SIG?
Cheers, Louis
It does fall into the scope of hardening but is also has enough scope of its own to stand alone. So keep an ear out (so will I) and try to get involved, but don't let it hold you up. If you hit any road blocks just loop me and KB in.
-- Corey
On 29/04/15 14:42, Corey Henderson wrote:
On Apr 29, 2015, at 4:12 AM, Louis Taylor louis@kragniz.eu wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:57:07AM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: All the GSoC stuff going through should map to a SIG ( or in some cases multiple ones ) - it would be great to see the GSoC students come along and interface with the SIG's, and maybe do updates on progress at the SIG Meetings.
Hi,
This sounds like a great idea. My project (kernel livepatching) seems to fall somewhere under the new hardening SIG, but that is still in the process of being set up. Is delivering kernel patch modules within the scope of this SIG?
Cheers, Louis
It does fall into the scope of hardening but is also has enough scope of its own to stand alone. So keep an ear out (so will I) and try to get involved, but don't let it hold you up. If you hit any road blocks just loop me and KB in.
We can always just use a timeslot as Hardening SIG ( and let the onramp / initial syncup for that group take place at the same time )
- KB
On 05/01/15 06:41, Karanbir Singh wrote: <snip>
We can always just use a timeslot as Hardening SIG ( and let the onramp / initial syncup for that group take place at the same time )
- KB
I must have missed the time slot list. Is that GSoC specific? More info?
Thanks!
Leam
-
Corey Henderson -
Karanbir Singh -
Leam Hall -
Louis Taylor