Hi
I am just wonderling if there is some problem getting out the packages:
cman-1.0.17-0.el4_6.3.src.rpm fence-1.32.50-2.el4_6.1.src.rpm
they where released in 1/feb/08 and 20/dic/07 respectibly according to this page: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel4.6.z-cluster-errata.html
what it is strange to me is that in each release day they where other packages released that are already in centos csgfs repo. so, is there a problem recompiling or just some how the packages remain hide to the ayes of centos developer?
thanks roger
__________________________________________ RedHat Certified ( RHCE ) Cisco Certified ( CCNA & CCDA )
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com
Roger Peña wrote:
Hi
I am just wonderling if there is some problem getting out the packages:
cman-1.0.17-0.el4_6.3.src.rpm
This one is compiled and released, however the "dist" tag was not correct. It is:
cman-1.0.17-0.el4.centos.3.src.rpm
And was released on 9 feb 2008.
fence-1.32.50-2.el4_6.1.src.rpm
That one was not released before, but it is released now. The problem was that it could not compile as it had a hidden build requirement for sechash.h and kept failing. I found that file in seamonkey-nss-devel ... however fence does not build as released by upstream.
It still needs a -I<path_to_seamonkey_nss_stuff> added to the Makefiles and pkgconfig and seamonkey-nss-devel as buildrequires.
Not sure how upstream compiled this, they did not do so based purely on the spec file and must have somehow modified their buildroot.
I did properly modify the spec file to get it to build ... so that one is labeled properly as ".el4.centos" and not ".el4_6" as well.
they where released in 1/feb/08 and 20/dic/07 respectibly according to this page: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel4.6.z-cluster-errata.html
what it is strange to me is that in each release day they where other packages released that are already in centos csgfs repo. so, is there a problem recompiling or just some how the packages remain hide to the ayes of centos developer?
Sorry about fence, but it does not compile as released, so that was the issue.
I was not the only one with this issue ... basically it is just a broken package:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/2006-December/msg00154.html
All should be good now. Make sure to keep an eye on me wrt c4 csgfs :-D
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
--- Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
Roger Peña wrote:
Hi
I am just wonderling if there is some problem
getting
out the packages:
cman-1.0.17-0.el4_6.3.src.rpm
This one is compiled and released, however the "dist" tag was not correct. It is:
cman-1.0.17-0.el4.centos.3.src.rpm
saw it but I though it was a centos patch to its previus release 1.0.17-0-el4 it is good to know it is the last cman :-)
And was released on 9 feb 2008.
fence-1.32.50-2.el4_6.1.src.rpm
That one was not released before, but it is released now. The problem was that it could not compile as it had a hidden build requirement for sechash.h and kept failing. I found that file in seamonkey-nss-devel ... however fence does not build as released by upstream.
It still needs a -I<path_to_seamonkey_nss_stuff> added to the Makefiles and pkgconfig and seamonkey-nss-devel as buildrequires.
yes, I see your email in linux-cluster about this subject :-) good work :-)
Not sure how upstream compiled this, they did not do so based purely on the spec file and must have somehow modified their buildroot.
you you think its worst to open an entry in bugzilla?
All should be good now. Make sure to keep an eye on me wrt c4 csgfs :-D
thanks a lot for your work never is enough to say how gratefull we are with the work of all you guys
cu roger
__________________________________________ RedHat Certified ( RHCE ) Cisco Certified ( CCNA & CCDA )
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail. Click on Options in Mail and switch to New Mail today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca
-
Johnny Hughes -
Roger Peña