Good Morning Everyone,
Nowadays we have different structures in the git repositories of the dist-git instance for CBS and for CentOS-Stream.
CBS' dist-git (used by the SIG and for CentOS Linux 7, CentOS-Stream 8), uses something like: ├── .gitignore ├── .kernel.metadata ├── SOURCES │ ├─ .... │ ├── patch-5.14.0-redhat.patch │ ├─ ... │ └── x509.genkey.rhel └── SPECS └── kernel.spec
Ie: patches and other sources in a SOURCES folder, spec in a SPECS folder and the link between the git repo and the lookaside cache is done via the `.<packagename>.metadata` file.
source: https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/tree/c8s
On CentOS-Stream 9, the structure is similar to Fedora's structure where everything is in the top directory. source: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/kernel
I was wondering if there has been some thoughts given on harmonizing these structures? I am particularly interested on changing them for SIG building on the top of CS9. It would make pulling changes from gitlab onto the SIG's repo a lot easier I believe. I suspect there may be some work to do for this and if I'm pointed to the right direction, I wouldn't mind having a look at it but first I'd like to know if it's a good idea :)
So... what do you think?
Thanks, Pierre
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 11:51 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou@pingoured.fr wrote:
Good Morning Everyone,
Nowadays we have different structures in the git repositories of the dist-git instance for CBS and for CentOS-Stream.
CBS' dist-git (used by the SIG and for CentOS Linux 7, CentOS-Stream 8), uses something like: ├── .gitignore ├── .kernel.metadata ├── SOURCES │ ├─ .... │ ├── patch-5.14.0-redhat.patch │ ├─ ... │ └── x509.genkey.rhel └── SPECS └── kernel.spec
Ie: patches and other sources in a SOURCES folder, spec in a SPECS folder and the link between the git repo and the lookaside cache is done via the `.<packagename>.metadata` file.
source: https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/tree/c8s
On CentOS-Stream 9, the structure is similar to Fedora's structure where everything is in the top directory. source: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/kernel
I was wondering if there has been some thoughts given on harmonizing these structures? I am particularly interested on changing them for SIG building on the top of CS9. It would make pulling changes from gitlab onto the SIG's repo a lot easier I believe. I suspect there may be some work to do for this and if I'm pointed to the right direction, I wouldn't mind having a look at it but first I'd like to know if it's a good idea :)
So... what do you think?
For the love of all things good, *please* change it to match Fedora! Hyperscale gets burned badly by this because we regularly cross between CBS and Fedora/EPEL. And now with CentOS Stream 9, we're working with all three, and it's *extremely* annoying for workflow automation.
So if you can, *please* make git.centos.org use the same layout as src.fedoraproject.org!
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022, at 10:53, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 11:51 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou@pingoured.fr wrote:
Good Morning Everyone,
Nowadays we have different structures in the git repositories of the dist-git instance for CBS and for CentOS-Stream.
CBS' dist-git (used by the SIG and for CentOS Linux 7, CentOS-Stream 8), uses something like: ├── .gitignore ├── .kernel.metadata ├── SOURCES │ ├─ .... │ ├── patch-5.14.0-redhat.patch │ ├─ ... │ └── x509.genkey.rhel └── SPECS └── kernel.spec
Ie: patches and other sources in a SOURCES folder, spec in a SPECS folder and the link between the git repo and the lookaside cache is done via the `.<packagename>.metadata` file.
source: https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/tree/c8s
On CentOS-Stream 9, the structure is similar to Fedora's structure where everything is in the top directory. source: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/kernel
I was wondering if there has been some thoughts given on harmonizing these structures? I am particularly interested on changing them for SIG building on the top of CS9. It would make pulling changes from gitlab onto the SIG's repo a lot easier I believe. I suspect there may be some work to do for this and if I'm pointed to the right direction, I wouldn't mind having a look at it but first I'd like to know if it's a good idea :)
So... what do you think?
For the love of all things good, *please* change it to match Fedora! Hyperscale gets burned badly by this because we regularly cross between CBS and Fedora/EPEL. And now with CentOS Stream 9, we're working with all three, and it's *extremely* annoying for workflow automation.
So if you can, *please* make git.centos.org use the same layout as src.fedoraproject.org!
To be clear, *downstream* sources that are dropped from RHEL will not be changing layouts.
--Brian
-- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
On Fri, 2022-01-28 at 17:51 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Good Morning Everyone,
Nowadays we have different structures in the git repositories of the dist-git instance for CBS and for CentOS-Stream.
CBS' dist-git (used by the SIG and for CentOS Linux 7, CentOS-Stream 8), uses something like: ├── .gitignore ├── .kernel.metadata ├── SOURCES │ ├─ .... │ ├── patch-5.14.0-redhat.patch │ ├─ ... │ └── x509.genkey.rhel └── SPECS └── kernel.spec
Ie: patches and other sources in a SOURCES folder, spec in a SPECS folder and the link between the git repo and the lookaside cache is done via the `.<packagename>.metadata` file.
source: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.centos.org_rpms_ker...
On CentOS-Stream 9, the structure is similar to Fedora's structure where everything is in the top directory. source: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gitlab.com_redhat_cento...
I was wondering if there has been some thoughts given on harmonizing these structures? I am particularly interested on changing them for SIG building on the top of CS9. It would make pulling changes from gitlab onto the SIG's repo a lot easier I believe. I suspect there may be some work to do for this and if I'm pointed to the right direction, I wouldn't mind having a look at it but first I'd like to know if it's a good idea :)
So... what do you think?
Thanks, Pierre
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.centos.org_mailma...
Consistency always makes me happy.
I'm not the person who'd be doing the work, but I'd gladly buy them a drink.
Pat
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022, at 10:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Good Morning Everyone,
Nowadays we have different structures in the git repositories of the dist-git instance for CBS and for CentOS-Stream.
CBS' dist-git (used by the SIG and for CentOS Linux 7, CentOS-Stream 8), uses something like: ├── .gitignore ├── .kernel.metadata ├── SOURCES │ ├─ .... │ ├── patch-5.14.0-redhat.patch │ ├─ ... │ └── x509.genkey.rhel └── SPECS └── kernel.spec
Ie: patches and other sources in a SOURCES folder, spec in a SPECS folder and the link between the git repo and the lookaside cache is done via the `.<packagename>.metadata` file.
source: https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/tree/c8s
On CentOS-Stream 9, the structure is similar to Fedora's structure where everything is in the top directory. source: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/kernel
I was wondering if there has been some thoughts given on harmonizing these structures? I am particularly interested on changing them for SIG building on the top of CS9. It would make pulling changes from gitlab onto the SIG's repo a lot easier I believe. I suspect there may be some work to do for this and if I'm pointed to the right direction, I wouldn't mind having a look at it but first I'd like to know if it's a good idea :)
So... what do you think?
We are not going to force folks using the exploded-SRPM layout to change *yet*. But SIGs should evaluate moving toward the standard dist-git layout. I think I still have a couple of changes to make so that CBS supports both, but especially for new work: plan to use the dist-git layout.
Thanks, Pierre
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
--Brian
On 28/01/2022 17:56, Brian Stinson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022, at 10:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Good Morning Everyone,
Nowadays we have different structures in the git repositories of the dist-git instance for CBS and for CentOS-Stream.
CBS' dist-git (used by the SIG and for CentOS Linux 7, CentOS-Stream 8), uses something like: ├── .gitignore ├── .kernel.metadata ├── SOURCES │ ├─ .... │ ├── patch-5.14.0-redhat.patch │ ├─ ... │ └── x509.genkey.rhel └── SPECS └── kernel.spec
Ie: patches and other sources in a SOURCES folder, spec in a SPECS folder and the link between the git repo and the lookaside cache is done via the `.<packagename>.metadata` file.
source: https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/tree/c8s
On CentOS-Stream 9, the structure is similar to Fedora's structure where everything is in the top directory. source: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/kernel
I was wondering if there has been some thoughts given on harmonizing these structures? I am particularly interested on changing them for SIG building on the top of CS9. It would make pulling changes from gitlab onto the SIG's repo a lot easier I believe. I suspect there may be some work to do for this and if I'm pointed to the right direction, I wouldn't mind having a look at it but first I'd like to know if it's a good idea :)
So... what do you think?
We are not going to force folks using the exploded-SRPM layout to change *yet*. But SIGs should evaluate moving toward the standard dist-git layout. I think I still have a couple of changes to make so that CBS supports both, but especially for new work: plan to use the dist-git layout.
Especially because that's still how sources for Stream 8 are pushed to git.centos.org (and 7/8 too), so that would mean asking Red Hat to adapt their internal workflow. And then impacting also somehow all the people consuming current layout, etc ... (hello other $rebuilds)
WRT cbs, if centpkg-minimal can then be changed to automatically detect which layout the git repository is using (or even just branch in case it differs from main one), that would work , as long as a src.rpm can be rebuilt by koji.
-
Brian Stinson -
Fabian Arrotin -
Neal Gompa -
Patrick Riehecky -
Pierre-Yves Chibon