Hi,
I see that there are updates and no lines with reasons in the SPEC file (%chagelog). Please include changelog messages to allow track the changes and reasons for this (when something breaks for example). Also there are a tools for tracking changes in the updated system by emailing %changelog changes together with sw updates.
Also there is almost no documentation even FC6 devel tree has a same package with a lot more docs:
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/...
There is still a question if the "stable" tree of CentOS 4 Extras should have latest and greatest package (in compare with FC4 or FC5 tree).
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 20:07 +0200, Milan Keršláger wrote:
Hi,
I see that there are updates and no lines with reasons in the SPEC file (%chagelog). Please include changelog messages to allow track the changes and reasons for this (when something breaks for example). Also there are a tools for tracking changes in the updated system by emailing %changelog changes together with sw updates.
Also there is almost no documentation even FC6 devel tree has a same package with a lot more docs:
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/...
There is still a question if the "stable" tree of CentOS 4 Extras should have latest and greatest package (in compare with FC4 or FC5 tree).
That is because this is the original release of that package for CentOS in extras ... there is therefore nothing to change in a changelog.
It is a first build done of that package ... and I did not use the FC package. It is a simple repackaging of the CPAN module in a standard perl template.
Thanks for your concern, Johnny Hughes
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 20:07 +0200, Milan Ker?láger wrote:
I see that there are updates and no lines with reasons in the SPEC file (%chagelog). Please include changelog messages to allow track the changes and reasons for this (when something breaks for example). Also there are a tools for tracking changes in the updated system by emailing %changelog changes together with sw updates.
Also there is almost no documentation even FC6 devel tree has a same package with a lot more docs:
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/...
There is still a question if the "stable" tree of CentOS 4 Extras should have latest and greatest package (in compare with FC4 or FC5 tree).
That is because this is the original release of that package for CentOS in extras ... there is therefore nothing to change in a changelog.
It is a first build done of that package ... and I did not use the FC package. It is a simple repackaging of the CPAN module in a standard perl template.
I was wondering if something was wrong with the RPMforge package, when I noticed that 1.01 was released. So that one will be available from RPMforge shortly as well.
Requests for updates can be made via suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 14:46 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 20:07 +0200, Milan Ker?láger wrote:
I see that there are updates and no lines with reasons in the SPEC file (%chagelog). Please include changelog messages to allow track the changes and reasons for this (when something breaks for example). Also there are a tools for tracking changes in the updated system by emailing %changelog changes together with sw updates.
Also there is almost no documentation even FC6 devel tree has a same package with a lot more docs:
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/...
There is still a question if the "stable" tree of CentOS 4 Extras should have latest and greatest package (in compare with FC4 or FC5 tree).
That is because this is the original release of that package for CentOS in extras ... there is therefore nothing to change in a changelog.
It is a first build done of that package ... and I did not use the FC package. It is a simple repackaging of the CPAN module in a standard perl template.
I was wondering if something was wrong with the RPMforge package, when I noticed that 1.01 was released. So that one will be available from RPMforge shortly as well.
Requests for updates can be made via suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
This package (and the other perl-* released on the Oct 7th in Extras) are requires for heartbeat-2.0.7 ... which will probably replace heartbeat-1.2.3 in Extras sometime shortly.
I do not want people to have to use other REPOs except CentOS ones for CentOS Extras, so CentOS Extras (when combined with Base / Updates) has to contain all requires for all packages ... which is why the packages were released.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
On Sunday 08 October 2006 18:57, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 20:07 +0200, Milan Keršláger wrote:
I see that there are updates and no lines with reasons in the SPEC file (%chagelog). Please include changelog messages to allow track the changes and reasons for this (when something breaks for example). Also there are a tools for tracking changes in the updated system by emailing %changelog changes together with sw updates.
That is because this is the original release of that package for CentOS in extras ... there is therefore nothing to change in a changelog.
It is a first build done of that package ... and I did not use the FC package. It is a simple repackaging of the CPAN module in a standard perl template.
As a suggestion, the changelog should have a line saying that this is the initial packaging. Changelogs should never ever be empty.
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 11:49 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Sunday 08 October 2006 18:57, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 20:07 +0200, Milan Keršláger wrote:
I see that there are updates and no lines with reasons in the SPEC file (%chagelog). Please include changelog messages to allow track the changes and reasons for this (when something breaks for example). Also there are a tools for tracking changes in the updated system by emailing %changelog changes together with sw updates.
That is because this is the original release of that package for CentOS in extras ... there is therefore nothing to change in a changelog.
It is a first build done of that package ... and I did not use the FC package. It is a simple repackaging of the CPAN module in a standard perl template.
As a suggestion, the changelog should have a line saying that this is the initial packaging. Changelogs should never ever be empty.
It does :-P ... it says:
* Sat Oct 07 2006 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org - 1.01-1.c4 - built for c4 extras
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
On Monday 09 October 2006 11:57, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 11:49 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
As a suggestion, the changelog should have a line saying that this is the initial packaging. Changelogs should never ever be empty.
- Sat Oct 07 2006 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org - 1.01-1.c4
- built for c4 extras
Ok. Apologies for not checking before I flapped my e-jaws.... :-)
-
Dag Wieers -
Johnny Hughes -
Lamar Owen -
Milan Keršláger