I had a look at the testing repo. Is it right there is only a fraction of RHWAS rebuild? Once packages are to stable will they go into plus or will there a rhwas repo?
Chris
financial.com AG
Munich head office/Hauptsitz München: Maria-Probst-Str. 19 | 80939 München | Germany Frankfurt branch office/Niederlassung Frankfurt: Messeturm | Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 49 | 60327 Frankfurt | Germany Management board/Vorstand: Dr. Steffen Boehnert (CEO/Vorsitzender) | Dr. Alexis Eisenhofer | Dr. Yann Samson | Matthias Wiederwach Supervisory board/Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Dr. Ernst zur Linden (chairman/Vorsitzender) Register court/Handelsregister: Munich – HRB 128 972 | Sales tax ID number/St.Nr.: DE205 370 553
On 06/30/2009 08:46 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
I had a look at the testing repo. Is it right there is only a fraction of RHWAS rebuild? Once packages are to stable will they go into plus or will there a rhwas repo?
In Short: yes, only a part of rhwas was done at the time, the java dep caused much irritation to both me and Johnny. We can revisit that situation again now with the openjdk stack being a slightly more realistic target to build against.
The plan is to rework the entire process that we have in place right now, so things like this can actually happen - and more people can get involved with them.
w.r.t the repo, the original thinking was to have it as a sub-repo under plus, so people could opt into only WAS or get the whole plus ( its in plus for c4, so its reasonable for people to expect access to the same chain in c5 as well ).
- KB
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:32:20AM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 06/30/2009 08:46 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
I had a look at the testing repo. Is it right there is only a fraction of RHWAS rebuild? Once packages are to stable will they go into plus or will there a rhwas repo?
In Short: yes, only a part of rhwas was done at the time, the java dep caused much irritation to both me and Johnny. We can revisit that situation again now with the openjdk stack being a slightly more realistic target to build against.
I've been trying to build it myself, with some success, however it seems that there is at least one dependancy on a proprietary java VM that is found on the Extras disk. I'm having problems compiling packages bacause of that.
The plan is to rework the entire process that we have in place right now, so things like this can actually happen - and more people can get involved with them.
Count me in.
Am Dienstag, den 30.06.2009, 11:32 +0200 schrieb Karanbir Singh:
On 06/30/2009 08:46 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
I had a look at the testing repo. Is it right there is only a fraction of RHWAS rebuild? Once packages are to stable will they go into plus or will there a rhwas repo?
In Short: yes, only a part of rhwas was done at the time, the java dep caused much irritation to both me and Johnny. We can revisit that situation again now with the openjdk stack being a slightly more realistic target to build against.
The plan is to rework the entire process that we have in place right now, so things like this can actually happen - and more people can get involved with them.
w.r.t the repo, the original thinking was to have it as a sub-repo under plus, so people could opt into only WAS or get the whole plus ( its in plus for c4, so its reasonable for people to expect access to the same chain in c5 as well ).
- KB
Well that sounds quite good. If anyone is interested i currently repuild JBEAP as is from RedHat SRPMS and it looks like it works up to now.
Chris
financial.com AG
Munich head office/Hauptsitz München: Maria-Probst-Str. 19 | 80939 München | Germany Frankfurt branch office/Niederlassung Frankfurt: Messeturm | Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 49 | 60327 Frankfurt | Germany Management board/Vorstand: Dr. Steffen Boehnert (CEO/Vorsitzender) | Dr. Alexis Eisenhofer | Dr. Yann Samson | Matthias Wiederwach Supervisory board/Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Dr. Ernst zur Linden (chairman/Vorsitzender) Register court/Handelsregister: Munich – HRB 128 972 | Sales tax ID number/St.Nr.: DE205 370 553