Am 18.08.2015 um 15:46 schrieb Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org:

On 08/18/2015 06:03 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:

...

This place may be more appropriate then centos-list. My subscription is new therefore sorry, if already asked:

How is the centos policy for EL6 SCL packages? I see some activities about a sclo7 branch but how is the status for rhscl especially el6's ones?

thanks for answering

I was under the impression that the SCL SIG was doing all SCLs for el6 and el7.

If they are not doing el6, I can maintain the ones we currently have in EL6, but I am not adding things where all the build requirements are not complete (ie maven, java, etc.)

in 6Server/en/RHSCL are a lot of more packages then in centos.org/6.7/SCL/, so - providing at least that packages that already were released would make sense.

I can maintain updates for the ones we currently have released if the SIG or softwarecollections.org is not maintaining them.

I do not see at softwarecollections.org something that correlates for example with:

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1629.html

For sure others have also some CentOS SCL packages in use. Therefore thanks in advance for your effort to closing the gap.

-- LF

Am 18.08.2015 um 23:33 schrieb Dave Johansen davejohansen@gmail.com:

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Leon Fauster leonfauster@googlemail.com wrote: Am 18.08.2015 um 15:46 schrieb Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org:

...

On 08/18/2015 06:03 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: I can maintain updates for the ones we currently have released if the SIG or softwarecollections.org is not maintaining them.

I do not see at softwarecollections.org something that correlates for example with:

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1629.html

https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/mysql55/ I believe that's the matching link.

sure, but I meant that it does not corresponds with version

5.5.36 vs. 5.5.45

and patch level

SCLO-2014-03-07 vs. RHSA-2015-08-17

-- LF