Is it useful to add this to the C bugz?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441615
I think that an alternative to the workaround mentioned there is to build the kernel with different options, but I've not tried that.
John Summerfield wrote:
Is it useful to add this to the C bugz?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441615
I think that an alternative to the workaround mentioned there is to build the kernel with different options, but I've not tried that.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248186
That does not mention the specific model, but I think the problems are the same .. if so, it is in the 5.1 release notes from upstream already.
Johnny Hughes wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
Is it useful to add this to the C bugz?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441615
I think that an alternative to the workaround mentioned there is to build the kernel with different options, but I've not tried that.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248186
That does not mention the specific model, but I think the problems are the same .. if so, it is in the 5.1 release notes from upstream already.
Mine's Intel CPU & chipset. I don't think they're the same.
-
John Summerfield -
Johnny Hughes