Hello.
What is the planned c10s dist tag scheme? I've noticed many builds use .el10+3 nowadays. Do we plan to ever lower that down to .el10? And if so, how do we deal with the fact that .el10+3 > .el10?
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:07 AM Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
Hello.
What is the planned c10s dist tag scheme? I've noticed many builds use .el10+3 nowadays. Do we plan to ever lower that down to .el10? And if so, how do we deal with the fact that .el10+3 > .el10?
I believe the plan is to do a mass rebuild after disconnection to move to .el10. That will raise the more significant digit (leading number in the Release field) to make it effectively higher.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 5:19 AM Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:07 AM Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
Hello.
What is the planned c10s dist tag scheme? I've noticed many builds use
.el10+3
nowadays. Do we plan to ever lower that down to .el10? And if so, how do
we
deal with the fact that .el10+3 > .el10?
I believe the plan is to do a mass rebuild after disconnection to move to .el10. That will raise the more significant digit (leading number in the Release field) to make it effectively higher.
Neal is correct, but it will be a bit more. We will bump it once more to .el10+4 today, and do a mass rebuild (Using their own buildroots, and nothing from ELN). We expect that will take a week. We will then change the tag to .el10 and do another mass rebuild. In theory, everything should just build. We'll see how that is in practice. There will be a few more things we'll be doing, but in the end everything making it into -gate -candidate and -pending will have a .eln10 dist-tag.
Troy
On 14. 02. 24 15:17, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 5:19 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@gmail.com mailto:ngompa13@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:07 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@redhat.com <mailto:mhroncok@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Hello. > > What is the planned c10s dist tag scheme? I've noticed many builds use .el10+3 > nowadays. Do we plan to ever lower that down to .el10? And if so, how do we > deal with the fact that .el10+3 > .el10? > I believe the plan is to do a mass rebuild after disconnection to move to .el10. That will raise the more significant digit (leading number in the Release field) to make it effectively higher.Neal is correct, but it will be a bit more. We will bump it once more to .el10+4 today, and do a mass rebuild (Using their own buildroots, and nothing from ELN). We expect that will take a week. We will then change the tag to .el10 and do another mass rebuild.
Bumping the more significant digit or not?
In theory, everything should just build. We'll see how that is in practice. There will be a few more things we'll be doing, but in the end everything making it into -gate -candidate and -pending will have a .eln10 dist-tag.
So basically even if it won't sort correctly, the .el10+X uilds are not intended to be composed/distributed beyond Koji. Do I get that right?
---
I was just curious if .el10^X wouldn't sort better (but it is arguably uglier).
---
Thank you both for explanations.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:41 AM Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
On 14. 02. 24 15:17, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 5:19 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@gmail.com mailto:ngompa13@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:07 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@redhat.com <mailto:mhroncok@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Hello. > > What is the planned c10s dist tag scheme? I've noticed manybuilds use
.el10+3 > nowadays. Do we plan to ever lower that down to .el10? And if so,how do we
> deal with the fact that .el10+3 > .el10? > I believe the plan is to do a mass rebuild after disconnection tomove
to .el10. That will raise the more significant digit (leading number in the Release field) to make it effectively higher.Neal is correct, but it will be a bit more. We will bump it once more to .el10+4 today, and do a mass rebuild (Using
their
own buildroots, and nothing from ELN). We expect that will take a week. We will then change the tag to .el10 and do another mass rebuild.
Bumping the more significant digit or not?
In theory, everything should just build. We'll see how that is in
practice.
There will be a few more things we'll be doing, but in the end
everything
making it into -gate -candidate and -pending will have a .eln10 dist-tag.
So basically even if it won't sort correctly, the .el10+X uilds are not intended to be composed/distributed beyond Koji. Do I get that right?
Well, they are in the composes right now. But you are not expected to use them, and if you are, don't gripe to us. There will be no el10+ packages at the RHEL 10 Beta. If there are still el10+ packages when we are getting close to beta, start working with the package maintainer. In an ideal world, there will be no el10+ packages by the end of the month. But I'm a realist, and am expecting something to go wrong somewhere. Troy
-
Miro Hrončok -
Neal Gompa -
Troy Dawson